安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Yeah that's pretty fast considering you're using 300 mods. But I gotta ask, are you using texture overhauls, something like Noble Skyrim? Or large, dlc-sized mods like Beyond Skyrim? Because these I think are the types of mods that really increase loading times.
I do run a texture overhaul for a base and SMIM
Some mods are heavy in their nature and will most likely add a few seconds to the loading time, such as DynDOLOD with the higher preset.
- Samsung 970 EVO 1TB priced at $159,95 (NVMe)
- Crucial MX500 1TB priced at $133,29 (SATA SSD)
Difference is $26, not huge. So I picked the NVMe. Especially since I also use 3D applications in production. That might benefit from the NVMe drive.
Anyway, thank you all for your inputs, they're really appreciated.
Yep that was to reasomn, too many heavy mods, so I need better load times. NVME fix it to me :)