Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
GTX960 and GTX1050 2GB have same level of performance. I'm also try my disktop to see if my i3-6100 can handle game to see if it needs upgrade too I already plan to upgrade my GPU.
I'm really don't fear them high specification when I already try a Accel World vs Sword Art Online that had higher minimum specification (GTX970 4GB) and the only place it really GTX970 was when flying around building with red particles it cause game that was running 60fps to drop 5fps even gtx1050ti drop 9fps even on low setting it still drop really low.
Hope the this game don't drop as low as 5fps
There may still be area that gtx780 3GB may be needit unless you don't mine or fear a massive performance even on low setting like me.
You are confusing GPU vram with hard disk space.
Vram looks not be issuse both GTX1050 2GB and GTX1050ti Game Debate show both low setting 1080p. If GTX780 was aim at low setting then this game is good port.