Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
If their intention for witholding tools is to sell more maps....... big mistake. Dlcs should bring new mechanics so ppl can play and change those in the workshop. Well is new so let´s see what´s down the pipeline.
We're reading it constantly.
That's not the intention at all. We're working on stuff for our first free update. DLC isn't even on the agenda right now.
I have enjoyed Aven Colony so far, but I think the significant difference from Anno 2205 is that there is very little focus on production chains. As any Anno fan knows, the heart of those games is all about optimizing your production chains and satisfying the very specific needs of your people to make the goods they want using those production chains.
Aven Colony seems to be more about balancing various aspects of your colony to avert disaster and keep your people generally happy so that they do not vote you out (similar to Tropico in that regard). You do produce goods like food for them, but it seems to be more about keeping a variety of food to keep them happy. However, I have just played an hour or two at this point so I certainly don't have the whole picture yet.
One positive commonality is that both Anno 2205 and Aven Colony are very direct with presenting the information you need with respect to levels of various resources. I appreciate having that information in front of me instead of having to piece everything together.
I think you should have realized that your experience as 'unknown' developers (not to say that you guys haven't worked on great games) could not be compared to the early access experience of Soren Johnson, a designer on one of the most well known games in video game history. You needed a lot more feedback which you would have gotten had you gone EA. I had forbodings about the decision in the first place, and it looks like I was right. Eventually I'm sure this game will be great, but by that time you'll need to discount it to get anyone to buy it. I hope you post your insights to choosing not to use Early Access at some point.
A Game can be simple but a simple game should be cheap as well. If this were a 5 dollar or 10 dollar game Maybe. But not for what we paid.
Anno 2205 with less focus on production chains and more on the city/desaster management.