Bug with Madolche Tea Break

[Ryu Fireheart]

It doesn't works with Madolche Puddingcess Chocolat-a-la-Mode, the text says:

"When a Spell/Trap Card is activated, if you have no monsters in your Graveyard: Negate the activation, and if you do, return it to the hand, then, if you control a face-up "Madolche Puddingcess", you can destroy 1 card your opponent controls."

I had a Madolche Puddingcess Chocolat-a-la-Mode on the field and it seems that the part "you can destroy 1 card your opponent controls" only works with the regular Madolche Puddingcess (i didn't test it with regular one, so both may have the bug).

[mimizukari]

"Madolche Puddingcess" is not "Madolche Puddingcess Chocolat-a-la-Mode" This is the difference between "Madolche Puddingcess" and "a Madolche Puddingcess monster". If you have any other ruling questions feel free to add me.

[Ryu Fireheart]

Originally posted by Shiki Ryōgi:

"Madolche Puddingcess" is not "Madolche Puddingcess Chocolat-a-la-Mode" This is the difference between "Madolche Puddingcess" and "a Madolche Puddingcess monster"

They share the same name and thats how yu-gi-oh rules works...

[mimizukari]

Originally posted by Ryu Fireheart:

Originally posted by Shiki Ryōgi:

"Madolche Puddingcess" is not "Madolche Puddingcess Chocolat-a-la-Mode" This is the difference between "Madolche Puddingcess" and "a Madolche Puddingcess monster"

They share the same name and thats how yu-gi-oh rules works...

The card does not say "This card is treated as "Madolche Puddingcess" while face up on the field." or (This card is always treated as"Madolche Puddingcess") , They share part of the same name, "Madolche Puddingcess" is not "a Madolche Puddingcess monster" If it was worded like the second example, it would work.

[mimizukari]

By your logic, you can polymerization a Proto Cyber Dragon because it has "Cyber Dragon" in the name, from your hand, with a machine monster on the field to make overdragon. That's not how it works, It is however treated as "Cyber Dragon" while face up on the field and can be used that way by its own card effect.

[mimizukari]

I have been a yugioh player since the game was released in the states, and I've judged at multiple events, I immediately see the issue with your OP, and pointed it out. It is not a bug why it doesn't work, "Madolche Puddingcess Chocolat-a-la-Mode" is not "Madolche Puddingcess", it is however "a Madolche Puddingcess monster" should it ever be worded that way, go back and look at your other cards, they all say a Madolche monster, not with quotations around it.

[Ryu Fireheart]

Your logic i a total failure.

[mimizukari]

Originally posted by Ryu Fireheart:

Your logic i a total failure.

I have given you your answer, Whenever there are quotations around it, it is naming a specific monster, whenever it says, a ? monster, it can be any monster with that in its name or that type of monster, attribute, ETC (replace ? with any archetype or type/attribute/etc).

Madolche Tea Break specifies a singular monster, one monster of which only one card in the game currently has that name of. "Madolche Puddingcess". Now, you can get around this with neo spacian dark panther and make your dark panther copy the name, or use phantom of chaos or what not, but the only original printed card with that name is Madolche Puddingcess, no more.

[Torchbound]

Originally posted by Ryu Fireheart:

Your logic i a total failure.

He's right though. You're not wrong, it's a bad rule/naming, but he's right.

[mimizukari]

Originally posted by RevenTL:

Originally posted by Ryu Fireheart:

Your logic i a total failure.

He's right though. You're not wrong, it's a bad rule/naming, but he's right.

she, and it's not a bad rule or naming, this is how it has occurred in every instance of card that has been written this way, " " denotes a specific card, while the terminology "a ? monster" denotes any monster with that name, type, or attribute, it's consistent since the old days and I don't see any problem with it.

[Ryu Fireheart]

Originally posted by RevenTL:

Originally posted by Ryu Fireheart:

Your logic i a total failure.

He's right though. You're not wrong, it's a bad rule/naming, but he's right.

I wasn't talking about this when i said "logic" ;p

[AYRTON SHY]

Go amigos unanse para duelos ranked http://steamcommunity.com/groups/yugioDR