Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So? You would still willfully end the life of another person? And during a cataclysmic, pivotal event that could decide the future of the human species; where all helping, human hands are valuable?
It's your choice. I chose to save someone from execution and make-do with the resources I had available to me.
As to the poster: it's TransStar propaganda - they potray him as a re-habilitated criminal who leads a happy life, while in reality he's a test subject and in fact none of the volunteers ever make it back earthside.
Nah.
Nah.
OH SH*T PRESS THE BUTTON THEN RECYCLE THE REMAINS AND JETTISON THEM INTO SPACE AT THE DIRECTION OF NEAREST SUN.
On the other hand, there's no doubt he's done some shady stuff. Admits to it, for one thing, which can be cynically argued to have been done to draw attention away from the worst he's done - and he does talk about not doing anything to children, which is quite suspicious in how specific it is. Realistically, he was a criminal involved with the Russian gangs, but maybe not as evil as he's suggested to be.
Remember, the "volunteers" get murdered to equal-opportunity standards and even the staff on Talos I are not told the full story about them. It's even stated at one point that everything done on Talos I is legal because there are no laws in space. That Ingram's file says he did all those things only means that's what presented as why he was imprisoned and brought up to the station.
It's a tricky scenario to resolve. I guess it comes down to whether you feel as though you have the moral right to kill someone in your power - and here's the other thing: you're being rewarded for doing so. Kill him and you get paid. Correction, releasing the mimics kills him and gets you paid. Because if you really felt as though he deserved death for what he did, which I should say again, we cannot be 100% sure he did, then you could always take responsibility by killing him yourself.
Open the doors. Let him out. Hear him out, maybe. Then kill him yourself. No reward of exotic materials. Just you dispensing justice personally.
Don't forget that later we find out that some are definitely political prisoners and the like. 32's heinous crime for example was to speak out against the Russian 'intervention' in India. He's told that if he signs the consent form he'd get to see his daughter again, and instead his demands are ignored as the science staff watches a Mimic murder him to see if the subject's age has any effect on Mimic reproduction.
For instance, you KNOW about the nullwave emittor, but January tells you to blow up the station regardless. You know Dahl's perogative, so is it wrong to help him? What's the difference bewteen the survival of Aaron Ingram and the survival of Talos 1? Aaron Ingram admitted to his crimes willingly, offering to help you, whilst those on Talos 1 were morally 'avoiding' knowing those who they tested on, even keeping some of the most sensative details away from you, the co-owner.
What I'm getting at is what is the difference between letting the station blow up and letting the mimic loose on Ingram if in both situations there is an alternative to save everyone? Or is it not surprising that most of the people aboard Talos 1 turn into monsters?
First; when I said "lying", that was probably the wrong word to use. My thought process was, "oh, you did some wrong things but you're not telling me so that I can get a better assement of you? Let me scare you with this mimic. Still not opening up to me? Ok, no one is probably going to get back to earth so I care little about your fate now." It wasn't so much about judging or having power or anything, it was more about lack of caring, for him or anyone.
Second; I did try to let him out before reloading my save and ultimately ending him but there was no option to talk to afterwards. He just gave me the code and that was that. Probably a bug or something, I don't know.
And thirdly; the connection I made with the poster was that he used Aaron's name so that it would be ambigious whether or not the rap sheet on the computer was actually his or not. In hindsight, I realize this doesn't make a lot of sense but you know what they say about hindsight.
Meeting him was literally the last thing I did so I kinda skimmed on most of your replies to not spoil myself. Sorry. Also, when you kill Aaron with the mimic, and you "recycle" the spawns, it gives you a ton of exoctic material. So in the end, loot still won me over morality.
It's interesting to see that most of you, if not all, decided to let him go. Really questioning my morals now...
Thanks to everyone who replied so far!
That's why the game is pretty great.