Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
The story parts where pretty good in Inquisition and it had a lot of interesting characters, but i feel it would be much better if it was half as long as it is now.
For what its worth i had fun with all 3 Dragon Age Games (yes even 2) so i still recommend to play the series.
My personal rating:
Dragon Age Origins 9/10
Dragon Age 2 7/10
Dragon Age Inquisition 8/10
DAO for me can range from 8-10 depending on the player.
DA2 would be 6-8.
DAI would be 7-9.
None of them are horrible, but 1-to-all of them could be disappointing, again depending on the player - and especially DA2. Generally, DAI won't be as good as DAO for most players (IMO), but it can be better to some.
You mean the hack and slash one button combat with no tactical features whatsoever, the broken tactical cameras, the 8-skill-limit for 5 year olds, the piss poor equipment that looks all the same for the most part, heavy armors that look like leather coats (no wait, they ARE), the multi-who-gives-a-♥♥♥♥ player on a single player RPG, the zero impact stronghold changes that are nothing but grindy, pointless fluff, the war table thats, again, more fluff because it impacts nothing whatsoever, much like the dragon keep, etc etc.
Better than DA:O? :D ok.
And advisors? what? You can also speak of the "better" AI if you wish, that sends ranged units flying into melee range to get their faces smashed by that Brute right there. Or maybe Iron Bull being the most useless crap the whole time because he will kill himself with dragons rage unless you turn it off, making him even more useless. Or maybe the party banter that is reduced to 2 or 3 lines per companion aka its almost non existing vs a DAO that had more depth on morrigans pinky alone.
DA:I has graphics, and that is it.
Then you didn't pay enough attention.
You just have a different way of perceiving things.
It is not a matter of perception, taste, opinion. They are facts. You can always be more specific and refute anything there, incase its wrong or i imagined things when i played it. Feel free.
Well said sir.
I really don't like how your character basically becomes king of the world 2 hours in. It makes no sense for there to be such a diverse following of a HUMAN religious organisation which persecuted elves in the past and has a strenuous relationship with the dwarves, and downright hates the qunari, but will somehow follow one of them because the virgin mary gave you a handshake (seriously, we're still having 'the chosen one' in 2014?) I don't want to play as a mary sue. In DA:O you had to work hard to get allies, here they fall at your feet to worship you... literally. In DA:O, you got attacked in denerim and lothering, because Loghain spread lies about you. In Inq? So many people allegedly hate you, but you never really feel like it's anything more than a mild annoyance. Your character is a total mary sue.
The combat has never been good in DA but at least in origins there were a lot more skills and a lot of interesting builds, from OP arcane warrior to archer warrior etc, now they simplified it it's a lot more boring. Combat should have been less spammy and more varied.
The villain is a complete paper tiger despite his menacing appearance. I was hoping that Anders/vengeance would be the villain. It would have made sense, given his absolutely insane actions in DA2, and he's part spirit so he could have survived his execution because magic. Failing that Flemeth would have made a better villain.
You can hate me for focusing on this but the romance was severely lacking. If you played straight male there were 2 options... straight female had up to 4. So much for replayability. I know you could have gay relationships but if your character's a representation of you and you're not gay... and isn't that the argument people have for it's inclusion? That it's optional, so you don't have to do it if you don't want to?. I don't expect it to be like a japanese VN and be the main focus of the game but if they were going to put it in they could have done more options and better options. I think bioware's writers don't really understand what straight men find attractive which is a problem cos like it or not they are a big section of the playerbase, perhaps the biggest.
Rant over.
As an avid rpg fan inquisition was fine now andromada on the other hand that was a gut punch.