Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
just to clarify, i know it's a risk game and the armies work the same way, but both risk showed ways of asymetric play(star wars risk and others), and other games in the same vein showed how to *tweak* the armies(axis&allies's national advantages).
I'll write to steam support and hope to get this wrong advertisement removed -_-
too late for me i suppose but at least others can be prevented from falling for this.
because it was the last day of x-mas sale, and there was plenty of interesting stuff, some i had to read up on(especially e.g. sword of the stars II or king arthur, both of which i had some catching up to do in regard to their current state), and others that were more "straightforward".
Risk is a game concept i am well familiar with, so i did not see much reason to check out how it works. I expected a risk game, i GOT a risk game. Nothing wrong that far. Except that the main selling point, to me, was "different factions" being included. A factor that would let me tailor the playing experience to my liking, and vastly increase replayability, if done right.
Just as example: In Civ V, there's rather small "differences" between the factions while all play according to the same rules, still interesting to retry with a different approach now and then.
So, yeah, i did not check up on it for the simple reason that it's a computer-game-version of a well-known concept, that used wrong advertisement, or more accurately, a blatant lie on it's store page, and i had more checking up to do on the day i bought it.
As for why bother buying- i wanted risk with replayability. I got boring 0815 risk. Theres a lot of difference.
when they say diferent fractions they mean the fractions are different not strong in one point and weak in another
Yeah, thats my problem with the store page, straightly quoted:
"Key Features:
Five unique factions with different strengths:
Play as the Human, Cat, Robot, Undead, or Yeti army!"
What they "say" and what they "mean" is utterly different from each other.
It "should" be:
Key Features:
Five identical factions with unique artwork for each:
Play as the Human, Cat, Robot, Undead, or Yeti army!
Guess their mindset going into making a $10 game is to make sure it's not worth any more than $10 as far as playability goes. Not to mention their 'random' dice battles get glitched sometimes and you'll lose your 20+ army to one defender. Wish they'd sell the rights or get off their asses and make the amazing game of Risk more enjoyable so we'd have people to play against.