Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But because my army size was too big I was not making any surplus money. So it left me in a financial pickle. Definitely not so easy. I'm going to restart and stay in my capital for a bit and see if I can build up that city before getting my second city. Maybe that will help idk.
I loved playing the, iirc, Vandals, and going horde myself .. sack the eastern empire and wait for the moment I had to deal with a rather aggressive opponent that would surface a wee bit later :)
Note that BI is set to be more difficult from the bat. If you happened to play VH in Rome and felt it was your limit, you would get crushed in BI if you play VH. So try it on normal to start with, possibly even easy and realize the game may be near impossible for some factions.
One way to deal with this is to become a horde in the very first turn and advance deep into roman territory, possibly Spain, and settle down there. This way you avoid the path of the initial hordes of huns and vandals.
Or you can prepare for an early fight that is expected to be hard. The classification of easy takes into account that you can become a horde yourself.
After i had encountered that myself i decided that the best way to deal with this is to attack first. The settlements taken there are already roman culture and make excellent additions to the empire. This is how you deal efficiently with roman treachery.
The only way would be to have a strong garrison to deter invaders. But this is expensive and at least when playing the western empire you donnot really have the funds for expensive troops to sit idle in a garrision.
You need to cut the amount of troops per city by about 50% to get a decent financial balance. Taking into account some decent to agressive expansion this means only about 40% less army maintenance, but distributed over 30 cities instead of the initial 25 ones. As the roman western empire aggressive expansion in the first 2 to 5 turns is key. It decreases expenditure and increase revenue. Also it gives you additional provinces as a buffer against the hordes. You donnot ewant them to enter your more profitable core provinces
AI will hardly ever not attack you. This is not new, it is the same as in the base game.
As a roman faction your troops are much more expensive than in base game, which makes the game harder.
The barbarian factions are in the advantage here, but they start without a properly sized empire to start with, which makes the initial 15 turns somewhat tricky.
If you made the right decisions in the first 15 turns, then you have a strong empire, be it a barbarian one or a roman one. Both have their strenghts. The romans troops are more expensive, but once you have them in decent quality and can afford them in decent quantity this is no longer a big concern.
When playing the Sassanides you start with 5 provinces that are reasonably well developed and you have the means to expands further at a decent pace. Maybe this faction is most easy to play. Just their unique religion can be a bit tricky to handle, which makes holding new territory harder, while defending well esteblished provinces is reasonably easy.
That's good to know, looks like I got spooked for nothing lol.