Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
The game runs a like crap on modern quad core cpu's and highend gpu's the core2quad would obviously be incapable of running the game. Something OP fails to understand is if you want to play Console Ports you gotta update your hardware to match console hardware or better. Core 2 quad is almost 9 year old cpu first quad core ever put out lol.
It would be the exact samething as complaining to a developer asking why they only release their game on ps4 and not ps3. The game is a pure console port unoptimized for PC. The minimum requirements are much higher than a core 2 quad. Minimum CPU Requirement is Intel Core i5-4460, 2.70GHz
- http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/623/Intel_Core_2_Quad_Q9550_vs_Intel_Core_i5_i5-6400.html
It would be a different story if the Core 2 quad just barely missed minimum requirements but the simply truth is the CPU required to run Quantum Break in a resolution of 720p@30fps is 90% better in multithreaded performance than the core 2 quad. Game would fry that CPU before the game would run with a Core2quad...
That's because it is a pure console port I swear it was ported to windows 10 store added customization settings and that is it and shipped out. Other developers support a wider range of PC Gamers better with lower settings for users such as yourself unfortunately remedy chose not to do this. This would have involved them do more work than just port the game in the beginning. As they would of had to make lower quality textures etc..
btw, minimum requirements by the dev are completely arbitrary most of the time. we all should know that by now. ;)
Don't be ridiculous. I've seen the gameplay videos on YouTube, there's nothing spectacular about Quantum Break. I play much more demanding games without a problem. You've really bought into the hype that tries to excuse QB's poor coding and lack of optimization.
That doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter what Remedy did with the code for the game. It doesn't matter how they chose to handled system requirements for the title.
What matters is that the released and listed SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS for the game list a minimum CPU that is newer then yours.
You personally decided to ignore that information and take a shot in the dark. With no solid information that it would work.
It doesn't matter what other games or other studios did or did not do. That has no bearing on what happened here.
What happened... you ignored the information released to inform you of what was needed to run the game. You bought a game knowing fully well certain hardware in your PC was under the minimum requirements.
You have no one to blame but yourself.
Yet, so stubborn you are trying to blame Remedy.
As if they lied to you. When they didn't. They didn not release system requirements listing your CPU. They never once said "Oh yeah, it'll run on a Core2Quad CPU"...
You made the decision. You ignored the information put out there to let people know if their PCs can run a title.
And you did so under the ignorance that "Well, this game can run on it, so anything can". Suck it up and admit your mistake.
If it doesn't run, it doesn't run. Why a restriction on what CPU you are attempting to run the game, that's the point. You are mentally stuck on whether or not he can run it, based on posted system requirements, that you are not considering the actual issue: The CPU lock.
Stop being confined on that mental box of yours. If it runs at 1 fps or 30 fps on that CPU, so what. The game can have posted requirements, but you are not guaranteed to be able to run it if you attempt to do it. It should end there, locking the game to certain hardware is not necessary, because if it's not playable, it's not playable!
The fan boys have been stuck in that mental loop for months, from when I first raised this issue in the Remedy forums in April and they came charging like White Knights to defend their favorite developer's honor.
You've been at this for months? Wow. You're the new MLK. Fighting injustice wherever it is. What a great way to spend your life's time. Using that time to have fun doing something else would be a complete waste. Yep yep yep!
I understand it can be frustrating when owners of 8+ years old CPUs can't test the game performance themselves. Based on QA reports such hardware doesn't produce a playable experience.
The instruction set missing from Intel Core 2 CPUs is used in Quantum Break's renderer, and currently there are no plans of rewriting it. As the thread title basically says it all, and the discussion itself seems to be more about insulting each other, I'm locking this thread.
So long, and thanks for all the POPCorn.