Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Maybe he should change his question to something like "its only 70 GB, why isn't it even smaller".
It doesn't matter **** if the game is open world or not. The thing that matters most is the texture size. And while QB is a pretty piss poor port, it's actual size IS still pretty small compared to what you are getting.
i.e.: look at the xbox one x version with its 4k assets and textures aswell as videos: almost 180GB.
Btw: You don't need to buy a few TB because of only 70 GB. A TB is much more than a GB. A TB equals exactly 1.000 GB.
on terms of raw data 1 Terabyte is only 0,9 Tebibyte (or 931,3 Gibibyte). That's why pretty much everything marketed as "1TB HDD" has actually "less" space when viewed under windows.
1 TB = 1 Terabyte = 1.000 GB = 1.000 Gigabyte
Windows is just wrong. Windows acutally shows the size in TiB, but it is labeled TB.
tl:dr: Windows is right and people were too dump to understand that the next higher value starts at 1024 and not 1000.
Can't wait for the first game to hit the 100GB barrier.
Look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_prefix#List_of_SI_prefixes
I win ;)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibibyte
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilobyte
Here you go: "In the early days of computers (roughly, prior to the advent of personal computers) there was little or no consumer confusion because of the technical sophistication of the buyers and their familiarity with the products. In addition, it was common for computer manufacturers to specify their products with capacities in full precision.[39]
In the personal computing era, one source of consumer confusion is the difference in the way many operating systems display hard drive sizes, compared to the way hard drive manufacturers describe them. Hard drives are specified and sold using "GB" and "TB" in their decimal meaning: one billion and one trillion bytes. Many operating systems and other software, however, display hard drive and file sizes using "MB", "GB" or other SI-looking prefixes in their binary sense, just as they do for displays of RAM capacity. For example, many such systems display a hard drive marketed as "160 GB" as "149.05 GB". The earliest known presentation of hard disk drive capacity by an operating system using "KB" or "MB" in a binary sense is 1984;[40] earlier operating systems generally presented the hard disk drive capacity as an exact number of bytes, with no prefix of any sort, for example, in the output of the MS-DOS or PC DOS CHKDSK command."
Have fun being educated!