Surviving Mars

Surviving Mars

查看统计:
Haugen Das Ice creme 2018 年 4 月 26 日 下午 4:25
Shuttle are so inefficent, be realistic rail is more effective.
I have to say passages are a half hearted attemp at a solution. Give us railway for resource transport and colonist migration. Shuttles also suck.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 11 条,共 11 条留言
bongerman85 2018 年 4 月 26 日 下午 8:23 
the shuttles wont carry more than one passenger at a time
vkobe 2018 年 4 月 26 日 下午 9:45 
gravity is lower, so it help even if is true than mars atmosphere is more thin

shuttle is faster, rail need maintenance, we have rover to carry resource on ground, pipe and cable are already a nightmare to manage so add rail will make it worse o.0

and it is for the same reason than we prefer to use airplane to travel new york to los angeles than use train, because it is faster
Uncle_Bulgaria 2018 年 4 月 27 日 上午 2:42 
Shuttles could use a bit of love from the devs in a patch. Currently they use too much fuel (imho) and they have a tendency to do annoying things with your resources. A tweak I'd like to see is some way of adding priorities to them, restricting where they'll take and deliver resources (probably a depot tweak to set min/max allowances on resources in individual depots).
Haugen Das Ice creme 2018 年 4 月 28 日 下午 8:46 
引用自 vkobe
gravity is lower, so it help even if is true than mars atmosphere is more thin

shuttle is faster, rail need maintenance, we have rover to carry resource on ground, pipe and cable are already a nightmare to manage so add rail will make it worse o.0

and it is for the same reason than we prefer to use airplane to travel new york to los angeles than use train, because it is faster

If you think a jet engine requires less maintenance in a dusty enviroment, over a sealed ball bearing. Your just being silly, rail also is highly more efficent than air transport, not to mention short distances between domes. You can ship goods and ppl at a fraction of the cost.
Fluffy 2018 年 4 月 29 日 上午 1:39 
Let's be realistic. Overground structures on Mars is a terrible idea. Domes? Fantasy. It should all be under ground where we can't see anything. That magnetic rail? Completely subsurface. Everything should be under ground, in fact, why is this game even a thing? Surviving Mars? Pah! More like Surviving... something... red and deserty... ...no, you shut up.
Nope 2018 年 4 月 29 日 上午 1:58 
It would certainly be nice if you could at least adjust which buildings are supplied with the shuttles and which not.
Blackveiled 2018 年 4 月 29 日 上午 2:28 
Shuttles are amazing personally, but they become expensive and an extreme burden if you're trying to utilize them over long-distance over an extended period of time.
Haugen Das Ice creme 2018 年 4 月 29 日 下午 1:01 
引用自 Fluffykitty
Let's be realistic. Overground structures on Mars is a terrible idea. Domes? Fantasy. It should all be under ground where we can't see anything. That magnetic rail? Completely subsurface. Everything should be under ground, in fact, why is this game even a thing? Surviving Mars? Pah! More like Surviving... something... red and deserty... ...no, you shut up.
Just call it railroad tycoon mars and it would sell like hotcakes lol.
vkobe 2018 年 4 月 29 日 下午 3:20 
引用自 vkobe
gravity is lower, so it help even if is true than mars atmosphere is more thin

shuttle is faster, rail need maintenance, we have rover to carry resource on ground, pipe and cable are already a nightmare to manage so add rail will make it worse o.0

and it is for the same reason than we prefer to use airplane to travel new york to los angeles than use train, because it is faster

If you think a jet engine requires less maintenance in a dusty enviroment, over a sealed ball bearing. Your just being silly, rail also is highly more efficent than air transport, not to mention short distances between domes. You can ship goods and ppl at a fraction of the cost.
i talk about the game not real life

for real life i can assure you we will not made dome, but dig in a hill or mountain to build a mars colony and than it is not with only one poor rocket we can start a viable colony on mars, if we want use true life card i can say to you than we will already send dozens of thousands tons of materials to mars before to start to build something and than with current technology drone are unable to build alone a viable base, so is mean we have not choice to send humans to help them

in the game drone are able to build space elevator or mohole or artificial sun without human help, but are unable to grow crope or dig iron, rare metal or made electronic or composants XD

shuttle is a lot faster than rover and their maintenance is not so expensive in the game and you dont need to micro manage them
rdr99 2018 年 5 月 22 日 上午 6:21 
@vkobe... I agree entirely with your remark about electronics and composites (polymer?). I have asked a couple of modders to make an outdome, fully automated electronics factory that can be set up BEFORE any colonists are brought to Mars. With good production and low cost too! So far, no luck. But that's what I'm waiting for.
ChoGGi 2018 年 5 月 22 日 上午 7:36 
Menu>ECM>Buildings>Remove Building Limits
Select the built factory and click WorkAuto
< >
正在显示第 1 - 11 条,共 11 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

发帖日期: 2018 年 4 月 26 日 下午 4:25
回复数: 11