Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Tomato, tomato.
No, they are not at all the same thing. One fits into the narrative of the story, the other does not. It is Zero predicting the actions ahead of time, and then executing the plan. This is why it makes sense when it gets interrupted by V and others, it was an event Zero either couldn't or failed to predict.
Please, tell us more about how we should interpret the themes and actions of an unreliable narrator based around a drug that doesn't have clearly defined side effects to fit only your interpretations.
Well, since you ask. It doesn't actually matter which interpretation is correct. While yours is clearly wrong and not supported by the lore supplied by the game, I was mainly calling out your disingenuous reply trying to equate them as the same. They are mutually exclusive interpretations, and them being precognition is listed multiple times in the game, through multiple sources.
*spoilers, of course*
I guess he doesn't say it outright, but I'm pretty sure he was doing exactly that. He talks about being a huge fan, and mentions hoping they got the scientist exploding on camera. You know he was watching all of that surveillance footage. That's probably why he filmed himself killing the neighbors. Like a fan film delivered to his favorite director.