Third person perspective.

[mike.gp]

I know a lot of people really like 3rd person view, but you would think for an open world immersive, military themed game like this 1st person would be better suited for immersion (think fallout, skyrim, far cry etc)- or at least an option. For me it makes the game 1/2 as appealing.

[Ambler]

Very happy the game is 3rd person otherwise I wouldn't consider buying it. Oh and OP, I don't know what Fallout and Skyrim you're playing, but those are both 3rd person games with optional 1st person view. Kinda like GRW.

[Comrade Brendonian]

Ambler님이 먼저 게시:

Very happy the game is 3rd person otherwise I wouldn't consider buying it. Oh and OP, I don't know what Fallout and Skyrim you're playing, both those are both 3rd person games with optional 1st person view. Kinda like GRW.

That's like saying "Is the glass half empty or half full?" it's simply a matter of perspective and opinion, both games could be 1st person with optional 3rd person, and vice versa.

[Ambler]

Heyi님이 먼저 게시:

Ambler님이 먼저 게시:

Very happy the game is 3rd person otherwise I wouldn't consider buying it. Oh and OP, I don't know what Fallout and Skyrim you're playing, both those are both 3rd person games with optional 1st person view. Kinda like GRW.

That's like saying "Is the glass half empty or half full?" it's simply a matter of perspective and opinion, both games could be 1st person with optional 3rd person, and vice versa.

Sure I consider them hybrids. But GRW already auto-switches to FPS during combat so not much different, although that can be disabled. Maybe they'll patch in an FPS option for the entire game, but I'm not sure there will be much demand. The game isn't really Battlefield or Insurgency.

[spikemtz]

If you don't think that there would be a great demand for a first person option in a Ghost Recon game on the PC, you must not be very familiar with the Ghost Recon community, or fans of tactical shooters in general.

[Ambler]

spikemtz님이 먼저 게시:

If you don't think that there would be a great demand for a first person option in a Ghost Recon game on the PC, you must not be very familiar with the Ghost Recon community, or fans of tactical shooters in general.

Then raise the issue on the UBI forums rather than the Steam forums and you might get somewhere.

BTW, what was the perspective in Future Soldier?

[spikemtz]

If you think that the issue hasn't already been raised on the Ubiost forums, you must not be very familiar with the Ghost Recon community, or fans of tactical shooters in general.

[Ambler]

spikemtz님이 먼저 게시:

If you think that the issue hasn't already been raised on the Ubiost forums, you must not be very familiar with the Ghost Recon community, or fans of tactical shooters in general.

You've already told me that. Look I am all for options. So I am sure you will support me if I go into the Siege forum and ask for a 3rd person view option...

[spikemtz]

That's not quite the same, and I actually brought that up in a previous post, in this very thread, using Counter-Strike as an example. Because Counter-Strike and Rainbow Six: Siege are competitive first person shooters, an optional third person view thrown into the mix would break the balance of both games, as it would give the players who chose to use it an unfair advantage over the players who don't, by enabling them to peek around corners, over obstacles, etc., without having to expose themselves. That wouldn't fly. "They can see us, but we can't see them..."

Because Ghost Recon: Wildlands is a co-op/single player third person shooter, adding a first person view wouldn't affect it in the same way that a third person view would affect a competitive FPS. Since it's non-competitive, the balancing issue wouldn't be a problem. It's a whole different ball game, and considering that the Ghost Recon franchise has traditionally been first person on PC, save for Ghost Recon: Future Soldier, which was a relative flop on PC, and the fact that you can aim down the sights in first person, it's kinda silly that it isn't already an option.

[DELTA]

Should do both like arma, i like 3rd person for screenshots and stuff but combat is aways ten times better in a fps than a 3rd person shooter as it just feels so clunky in 3rd person. that said we have first person aiming which should help but i hope there is first person driving and flying modes too

[mike.gp]

spikemtz님이 먼저 게시:

If you think that the issue hasn't already been raised on the Ubiost forums, you must not be very familiar with the Ghost Recon community, or fans of tactical shooters in general.

Exactly, and you people can say what you want but in the end, for shooters, first person > third person. And for those who played fallout and skyrim in 3 rd person- bummer for you. I would also hazard a guess that those who prefer 3rd person for shooters have their gaming roots in consoles, not pc.

[KylRoy]

Exactly, and you people can say what you want but in the end, for shooters, first person > third person. And for those who played fallout and skyrim in 3 rd person- bummer for you. I would also hazard a guess that those who prefer 3rd person for shooters have their gaming roots in consoles, not pc. [/quote]

I fully agree.

[Doolan]

I think they would add a first person view for those who likes it.

[KylRoy]

well, I think the game is about mediocre from my perspective, but I would give it a try (preferrably coop) if they patched this in.

[Silver]

starwatcher님이 먼저 게시:

spikemtz님이 먼저 게시:

If you think that the issue hasn't already been raised on the Ubiost forums, you must not be very familiar with the Ghost Recon community, or fans of tactical shooters in general.

Exactly, and you people can say what you want but in the end, for shooters, first person > third person. And for those who played fallout and skyrim in 3 rd person- bummer for you. I would also hazard a guess that those who prefer 3rd person for shooters have their gaming roots in consoles, not pc.

Thats because Bethesda dont know how to make a third person game.
Its obvious with both Skyrim and Fallout that its meant to be played in First Person so third person got no love thats why it works like ♥♥♥♥.

[Silver]

Lord Gaben님이 먼저 게시:

I think they would add a first person view for those who likes it.

You can aim in First Person view thats all you need