Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
Im just refuting the logic of tactical realism in games.
Now if you want to insult the writting and, and the repetive nature of ubisoft games, please do.
I dont mind.
Though military themese tend to be boring by nature, unless its unrealistic like say BF or COD, were you play as a rambo like hero.
CASH ME OUSIDE HOWBOW DAH?
Face it most gamers want a game they can pick up and play and enjoy and not have to think that much. I myself like more tactical games like arma 3 but I do enjoy a game I can just pick up and play for alil bit without much effort to just enjoy and do stuff and hell most of these games I dont even tend to finish but I still get decent hours of playtime out of them because I enjoy roaming around finding hidden things and not just going from mission to mission and rush through ♥♥♥♥ but thats me.
If this game is not for you than so be it but theres no reason to bash it just because its not a game you yourself would like. Hell the game isnt even out yet and your ♥♥♥♥♥ about graphics like come on dude all you did was rant about crap.
If you were sincere, and it's patently obvious you are not, with your troll remarks, tantrums, histrionics, ad hominem attacks, swearing, insults, and sophomoric arguments loaded with logical fallacies -- you'd at least make a child's effort to read what you imagine you're responding to and you haven't even done that...
But thanks for all the troll bumps, many tactical realism fans of the original Ghost Recon and other TRGs mentioned that happen here will thank you for that! All things considered this being the simplistic game it is; you're probably representative of the kind of audience Wildlands is going to attract, which will serve as fair warning as well.
You just a meanieface!
Anyhow, I bare you no ill will, no hard feelings, maybe even see ya online and play Wildlands COOP with ya some time! I would really like to encourage you to try Ghost Recon (the original some time), it has COOP too, and even COOP where each player has an entire squad of AI backup as a team he controls -- it's a VERY cool game, and on so many levels this newer game doesn't even begin to approach, though obviously being nearly twenty years old Ghost Recon doesn't look as impressive as Wildlands...
This is a non sequitur on all counts; reality has been acknowledged, acknowledgment of reality doesn't require nostalgia or stopping it. This has no bearing on any argument made here by anyone.
Ubisoft has lost and alienated an enormous fan base to what was a very original, unique and definitive game in Ghost Recon. The slow burn sales statistics for this game were staggering, as were the number of community game, mod and competitive websites that approached what existed for Counter-Strike at the time. Play share in number of players online at any given time was similarly very impressive even by CoD standards
Had Ubisoft done what the Developers and Publishes of CoD, CS, and Battlefield et al had done and just refined, polished and improved what they had through iteration; they'd much more likely have a more successful series of games that could accurately be called a 'franchise'...
As things are, do you seriously imagine what is in essence an RPG zombie shooter in baby's first paint ball vs drug thug drag will achieve anything resembling the success these other game franchises that are actually franchises?
Games like COD sell more simply because it caters mostly to the young crowd and younger players will spend more money and spend more time on these types of games because they don't care about using mom and dads credit card and they just have more free time. So ofc gaming companies are going to cater more to the people who spend more money remember these people run a business not a charity. They are in it to make sales and bring in more money its really that simple.
The younger players will spend money on stupid crap like weapon skins and crates simply because they dont know any better because that is what they grew up on but older players didnt grow up with this crap in the game industry now but the younger players did and they think all these season passes and collector editions and micro transactions are normal.
Again Ubisoft is a company that has to make money and show good quarterly reports to the investors is called business. You wouldnt make a business selling beach equipment in the middle of the desert now would you? Ofc you wouldnt like I said its simple game companies are targeting the younger player base because they are the ones who spend more money on stupid crap after already paying 60$ for the game itself. Really it comes down to money plain and simple.
But anyway if you don't like the game than don't buy it. If you havent noticed big AAA companies are targeting younger players again the players that will spend more money because in the end there in it to make money if you do not understand that than you my friend must be special.