Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
87 characters in the base game
27 DLC characters
I like it better than Tenkaichi 3
people like to talk out their butts. Kanedow has an opinion that taenkaichi 3 isnt that good and xenoverse 2 is way better. To him he is perfectly correct.
where he started talking out his butt is every thing else in his statement.
His comment should only read Tenkaichi 3 isnt that good, xenoverse 2 is way better imo.
The rest he said is talking out his butt.
Seriously though, Tenkaichi 3 was good, and had a lot more singleplayer stuff to do than xenoverse 2 does. Tenkaichi's only real flaw was the sameyness of much of the cast's movesets. When it comes down to the actual fight mechanics, Tenkaichi is ahead.
Gameplay wise, the first Raging Blast game is the perfect middle ground between the gameplay styles of Tenkaichi and Xenoverse. Only real issue with Raging Blast 1 was the smaller roster.
I can't really speak for Raging Blast 2, some of the crap in the 'galaxy mode' killed it for me pretty severely.
Xenoverse just feels shallow in comparison when it comes to gameplay depth to me. Xenoverse's real main draw is the CaC. Remove that and there is really no reason to take it over one of the older games.
Of note, I'm not even going to bring up 'balance'. I'm just talking about gameplay feel.
To me it goes xenoverse 2 budokai 3 tenkaichi 3