Baby Vegeta?

[Kanavus]

Why exactly does Bandai hate Baby? In the first game, they included SUPER 17, who I often forget exists, and not the saving grace character of Dragon Ball GT, and although that is just my opinion, I know a lot of people agree that Baby is definitely the best enemy in GT. In this game, they include his clothes, and not him? What? Based on what we're seeing from the DLC details and based on how it's always in chronological order, they're onto Super now, so I can't see Baby Vegeta being a DLC character. The game is awesome and I love it, but c'mon guys.

It'd be different if it was a villain like General Blue or Pilaf, who no one cares about, but Baby was one of the BIG villains of GT. It's a lot like how they included Tao's clothes and not Tao. It just seems like they were too lazy, I can't see any other reason why they'd leave out such an important character.

A guy in the comments brought up Rilldo, and I agree with that as well, I think Rilldo would be an awesome unique character to play as

[Teaspoon]

引用自 Shiki Ryōgi：

引用自 Hanuke：

Yeah. People hate GT but love SS4 for some reason (and SS5 and SS6 and SSGSSW7,8 and 9 fused with the Omni King cuz the internet has it all). So GT will keep showing up in DB games for awhile.

people who hate GT also hate super saiyan 4. look, GT's quality compared to the rest of the series is bad, incredibly bad, I enjoy GT but my rating basically goes, db 10, dbz 8, dbzk 9, dbs 9, GT 6. it's horrendous quality wise and they should've never tried making a series without akira.

Not everyone who hates GT hates SS4. Over time many seemed to warm up to the design of SS4. It's quite striking and an interesting hybrid of the Ozaru and Super Saiyan forms.

As time went on SS4 became increasing popular while GT became more disliked however people's dislike of GT didn't (always) carry over into SS4.

[wizard master結城晶子リ]

引用自 Kanavus：

Why exactly does Bandai hate Baby? In the first game, they included SUPER 17, who I often forget exists, and not the saving grace character of Dragon Ball GT, and although that is just my opinion, I know a lot of people agree that Baby is definitely the best enemy in GT. In this game, they include his clothes, and not him? What? Based on what we're seeing from the DLC details and based on how it's always in chronological order, they're onto Super now, so I can't see Baby Vegeta being a DLC character. The game is awesome and I love it, but c'mon guys.

It'd be different if it was a villain like General Blue or Pilaf, who no one cares about, but Baby was one of the BIG villains of GT. It's a lot like how they included Tao's clothes and not Tao. It just seems like they were too lazy, I can't see any other reason why they'd leave out such an important character.

A guy in the comments brought up Rilldo, and I agree with that as well, I think Rilldo would be an awesome unique character to play as

plus it would just be a skin remade with vegetas move set and babys voice would not be no diffrent

[Smithers]

Baby and SS4 were definitely the best parts of GT. The Shadow Dragons was a great idea in theory, but in practice it just fell flat - they're all boring. Super 17 was just a bizarre idea and it that turned out to be as stupid and boring as it sounded in theory. Baby, although wasted potential with that whole Tuffle thing, at least he turned out to be thoroughly entertaining. It would be neat to have him in XV2, even if it's just a re-skinned Vegeta.

Don't worry too much though. Modders figured out how to add new characters and slots, so it shouldn't be too long before someone makes a really solid Baby Vegeta mod.