Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No, this does not require an IQ above 20 but rather less, since the balancing is way worse than HS and you literally just play 5 - 8 META decks and the newest OP legendaries EVERYWHERE.
Without netdecking no chance in this multiplayer.
So this card game is even more braindead than HS, but hey, it's got shiny cards and cool effects
eg Witcher in hearthstone is a mix between shadow and bloodcraft.
The second player advantage is much higer here than in hearthstone,
class actions are much more used than the evolveing since it was not limited( which makes the classes more different than the craft types)
Haste and Stormatack here instead of one in hs:
These are the main difference in the gameplay of those two.
Here you have limited slots for creatures which maybe makes the minnions decks less effective.
30 LP th 20 LP is not that much because in may opinion hs has less healing powerrate than sv.
SV is missing some mechanics like amor, weapons, traps amd destruction of your own play points.
In my opinion the arena in hearthstone (1 out od 3 cards) is better than the take two here.