安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
In terms of actual JRPGs, The Legend of Heroes: Trails in the Sky bares some similarities. It's a little more involved, but the flow and strategy of battles is similar.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/330390/
I didn't finished much, and even the few I finished, it wasn't like Legend of Heroes: Trails in the Sky and even less like Battle Chasers: Nightwar.
So I was wondering if someone experienced in JRPG could see if they have key differences with other JRPG and that they share, and if there's other JRPG matching.
Myself, I don't know, I'd say:
- Almost no grinding, a few but very few.
- Good combats with a fairly good diversity.
- Ok writing, doesn't abuse of teens cliches.
- Otherwise overall quite good but that's not a criteria.
South Park crash on launch on my computer, problem never solved.
That said I don't like much the cartoon, it got me tired past 10/20 episodes, I have doubts the game works that well for a non fan of the cartoon. Moreover it has real time elements that have a good chance to bore me, and even more I never ever enjoyed RPG using sarcasm about RPG.
That you mention DOS makes me think we aren't on the same track, I can't see any single link with DOS1.
However, a Jrpg not based around a group of teens is kind of as common as a manga or anime not based around a bunch of 15 year olds. (Even Guts is younger than 15 in the Golden Age ark)
Turn based/ strategy
Isometric
Not to grindy
I have never played Trails in the sky, maybe one day. lol
I would still suggest FF over anything else though
Ye but they are quite different. Jrpgs usually have a pretty linear path with some sidequests that don't really affect the main quest. DOS1 and 2 are literally the tabletop dungeons and dragons translated into a videogame. Speaking plainly, in DOS there's are as many ways to complete a quest as to ♥♥♥♥ it up. In jrpgs you can't really ♥♥♥♥ up.
Ah, I see. I own them but have not got far in either, especially battle chasers as I'm currently playing prey. Mainly wanted to see if battle chasers would run without any problems and then proceed to wait for updates before I fully play it.
BoF2 has a place in the game that gives insane experience, but most people avoid it until the very end of the game where the second-to-last boss is INSANELY harder than the rest of the game and requires a huge amount of levels to even be doable. (Since I last played on an emulator, and used the infinite strength trick for Katt, it took me over 125 savestates and meticulously playing out that fight to beat it, at level 46-47 (recommended at 50+). Last dungeon is entered around the 40s, so it was a bit ridiculous. Even had most of the easier to obtain ultimate gear by that point.
BoF3 never really requires a lot of grinding in any one place. The fishing minigame can be annoying, but also isn't required. The master system was introduced in this game, which gives some cool character leveling options for stats and perks. I can't really recall how BoF4 stacks up, but I don't have fond memories of it.
Valkyrie Profile's combat is actually the most attractive part of the game. Learning each character, and who you'll keep in your main line up when you can, is cool. It's got a decent difficulty curve without being overbearing. Some of the dungeons can be confusing or hard, especially on hard mode where I feel a guide is necessary for some of the later, puzzle-like ones. The story is interesting to say the least and I've been dying for a third game in the series.
Personally, despite liking most of the Final Fantasy series, I hated FFX. Like, cannot stand that game at all. I've played it start to finish (minus superbosses/extras), but I honestly enjoyed FFX-2 more, because of the active combat system.
Since you mentioned Chrono Trigger, I highly recommend pushing through and beating that game. It's so worth it, and absolutely deserves all of the praise it's received over the years.
And it sure has the best fishing sidequest ever , in any game I have played .
You need to grind a bit, but not overly much . I guess all rpg`s usually has some grinding.
Maybe the game closest to Battle Chaser - I believe BC has been inspired a lot by this old gem.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/256460/Cosmic_Star_Heroine/
You don't have to grind a single fight. Enemies don't respawn, and they are visible on the screen. The devs really care about the players' time, and have made it so that IF you want to grind, you can do so in a very clever way. I played the game on the hardest difficulty (not for the faint of heart btw), and didn't have to grind once.
The combat system is also great, with fights having a flow and you needing to time your abilities based on when the characters get Hyper (you'll understand when you play). It gives the system enough strategy that will keep the combat entertaining till the end.
The story is fairly basic, but the game is only about $15. It's a steal at that price, really.
No I played both or I'm closing to finish first play for BNC, and they are hugely different. That said in their different genres I had a lot of fun with both.
thanks for the comments, I don't think I tried Breath of Fire and Valkyrie Profile, I quoted Valkyrie Chronicle but it could be Profile. The grinding aspect is major for me, so it's good to know.