Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Oh it's just this thing you see, I want a decent forest in the new map so your solution is really not a solution. I figure the game is called Farming Simulation 2017 and I also figure the developers of the game decided to introduce forestry as early as in FS 2015. They are still entertaining the idea of promoting forestry as an important part of the game, why else would they add even MORE forestry equipment in FS2017? Which is why I wonder why we have more fields than we could possibly need and at the same time they fail at designing a wooded landscape suitable for medium to large scale forestry. I mean, the map is big enough to saitsfy both needs! It's like there was no communication between the crew responsible for the map design and the crew responsible foir the rest of the game.
"Oh, so we ARE keeping the forestry machinery? So we SHOULD have more forested areas? Why can't they just go about chopping down the trees that are spread throughout the map, along roads and next to public areas, I mean our clientel doesn't want realism do they?"
At least the sapling planter will come to good use! I've started making my own wooden areas even though I don't think I should've to...
I linked pics from my Steam online gallery, they don't show up as embedded pictures for you?
Ah, perhaps it will work better if I make the pics available to the public :D
LOL! Sorry, but there's nothing rational about what you just wrote.
GIANTS realize most people don't want to do forestry, sooooo GIANT spends time and effort into giving us even MORE forestry machinery? Please! :)
I'm probably the ONLY one seeing the big picture here, you seem more interested in fighting arguments rather than listening to them.
Nope, it does not solve the problem. Using modded maps deals with the symptom but doesn not get to the root cause, thus it does not solve the problem. Get it?
Some trees even seem to grow back after a couple of days, but that might have been a feature of the updated map in the patch.
I don't think GIANTS make map changes on personal request
Neither do I, I don't even know why you are bringing that up since I never suggested they should. Either you're taking everything I say literally or you're being juvenile.
Aren't you saying that default maps don't have enough forestry?
I think the root cause is he wants his money for nothing and his trees for free . . . and maybe someone to do it for him so he can keep solo wanking
You're completely off the mark. First you can't stick to the topic, instead you bring my nick name into this and then you can't distinguish between complaints and constructive feedback. To round things off, you persist on referring to Sosnovka all while I'm trying to point out the design flaws of the new map that came with FS2017. If I thought it'd be a total waste of time trying to feedback GIANT on their work then I'd probably go for a modded map from the start.
I don't expect everyone to agree with me but at least stick to the subject. If you want to discuss something completely different, start a new thread.