Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I am not so much excited about the change, although the only thing that really concerns me is that vehicles bought as premium retain their credit earning bonus, so as long as the credit coefficient still reflect that, I am fine.
It's more about El_Din as usual being like the most helpful person on this or any other game forum I ever met, and always makes sure to provide info for the community.
I don't see much difference from them on the battlefield either. WG hasn't said much, just that premiums need to stand out on their own. The only real effect on players is the possibility of those tanks being nerfed and the change in their sell/rrestoration cost from credits to gold.
There's more questions on the restoration changes, of course.
Probably the decisions were still being made. N0_name_just_luck made some earlier commentgs about premiums ending up being "15-20%." He's careful with what he says until there's a final decision, so I think they are still making decisions on some tanks.
The high tiers also seem to be their priority, and I expect there to be few premiums left there. That is where most of the premiums were anyway. I don't think they care as much about mid to low tiers to begin with.