Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Link it pal.
They could of released Jason X and finished the Grendel map in the time allocated before the cease and desist would be in effect. After Miller won the first round, it should of been fairly obvious that a cease and desist would be around the corner and should of been a factor to push that content out.
The game before the January update was still a buggy mess. Counselor sliding and standing on cars (until recently ;) ) was still possible making most games already Counselor dominated, not to mention multiple Jason techs as well were discovered during this period that allowed Jason to not worry about kill squads anymore. Also, ever since release they added proper anti-cheat and altered the coding for Jason skins and perk stacking which really made the game less fun to those who were looking for something else to do other than tryhard in the sense of not giving yourself any advantages. Three Epic Aquanauts on Vanessa anyone?
From the period where they stopped supporting new content to the January update and now, they could have pushed out bug fixes and properly made the game playable. But we all know now that that really didn't happen because lo and behold the incompetent devs thrown a flashbang into the community, and here we are still disputing/arguing when the evidence is there still on how it went down.
Oh, and lets not forget about Praetorian. lol
It was unfinished there was no music for jason x yet... could they have rushed it? maybe. Maybe not. Either way it wasnt released. And due to the appeals process nothing NEW that has to do with Friday the 13th can be released. Not by gun, not by anyone.
Are they linked somewhere around here, or are your referencing them more generally? I'd like to watch them.
Yes but using the character, backstory or anything referencing things ESTABLISHED in the first movie is open to litigation for a piece of the pie... unless you want another roy burns using "jason vorhees" is enough gray area to stop any additional content. I mean even the title would fall into first movie territory.
Oh, the interviews with Shelley. Yeah, he's not a copyright lawyer, he's an entertainment lawyer, so I misunderstood you. Also, this isn't his case, but even as is (and I watched the videos), he said the termination was in 2018. He's pretty unclear on communicating his point, but he says two things: 1.) game updates in these types of cases is a new issue and there is no precedent on how to deal with it 2.) he vaguely says something about not "putting in new stuff."
All that aside, why can they release a "new" edition of this game (it's not new, but it's name and platform is new)? To be clear, there is NOTHING clear on this case, and not adding content makes sense (tho no one has definitively said that they were ordered to do this, just that Miller put a termination on the copyright which locked things up. But do you really believe new bluray volumes would come out tomorrow if they were pending release? I'd say if the lawsuit is so serious, then no, yet those were movies already made right? This whole thing might make sense if they didn't release on Switch.
YES! Because they needed an excuse to bail on something they didn't care about.