Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But, seriously... yes, the setting is the same, but this is an RTS which plays off a risk-style conflict grid between a mass of races. You have a persistant hero character who levels up, and you can actually keep some of your experienced troops and carry them over between battles.
In addition to simply having a persistant main character these, level up growing stronger, and could also complete missions around the map, or collect items. Similar in a way to Spellforce, but, in my opinion, vastly better.
I really enjoyed the world of PQ and it reminded me of the Warhammer, Horned Rat game, in that it wasn't heavy into mythical fantasy magic.
As a matter of fact, as silly as it might sound to outsiders, Puzzle Quest had a story where WBIII didn't.
Think of WBIII's campaign as Rise of Nations, while the difficulty and available troops of the world change as the world map does, there isn't anything other than complete map conquest driving the forces forward.
Although, that said, I must reiterate that the persistant main character and troops really did make the game stand out as well as the fact there were 12(?) factions in the game, all vastly different, from Fae to Dwarves, from Humans to Demons.
(Also +1 to what Protoss said)
Not so much a fan of the setting of Horned Rat, more the way Magic is acknowledged in that realm and that it exists in it's own world. I guess when you have a long run of previous products set in the world you can pull from those stories.
I enjoyed Starcraft/C&C/RA more than Warcraft1/2 due to the story and characters, I wasn't grabbed by the story. I remember once being in Sheffield and being shown Warcraft 3 and being amazed by it, but in the ten years since I've never followed that up.
You can't call it an RTS
Since you finish your hero's leveling, he will be unstoppable, so it's more RPG than RTS
I have played this game for so many years i bought this game back in 2004 and have it on GOG.COM i know what this game in about
So in a nutshell it combinds the elements of Diablo 2 Leveling your hero,Getting powerful items
And warcraft 3, Picking one of SIX TEEN!!! Races, Building a base and gathering Things like Gold,Metal,Stone and Crystal to buy units,more buildings and get upgrades to crush your enemies in one of many diffrent Win Victory Condision
THere is a camgain to it which is acutaly a sort of open world type but you have to do a few of the main missions inorder to unlock the whole world to explore and best part you can use any hero/race you want
Completely and utterly untrue. Also, guys, I suggest downloading the unofficial officla patch on the WBC3 wikia! Great game!
I have play hours and hours of WBC III on the original cd version and Gog.com version as well.
It is not even remotely a RPG at all. More like Rise of Nation with Heroes progression on the side and veterancy for units. Nevermind the hiring unit from battle to battle both online and campaign.