Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i'v seen 1 in my 10 or so hours in free roam
I think it is completely unbelievable. The protagonist couldn't care less about the fact the light can't escape a black hole, when the protagonist can move 1 trillion times its speed.
The protagonist also has has momentum, should that be removed because it kind of aligns with the laws of physics?
Just because superman flies doesn't mean things he throws need to float instead of falling to the ground.
If we disregard that though and go with Ivandrov's statement that the player doesn't care about normal physics, well, neither do black holes. Continuing the superman analogy, just because Superman is all powerful here doesn't mean he's invulnerable everywhere. His most consistent weakness are objects and people that are from Krypton and therefore very similar to him. Objects rooted in normal can't hurt the player, but something that also disregards normal physics, that's an equal opponent.
But, that's my whole point. Neither are rooted in physics. Everyone in this thread has treated the protagonist like an object that is rooted in physics when interacting with black holes and is therefore destined to die in the black hole. When in fact, the properties of the protagonist are unlike anything that physics can explain. Let's look at this from a different direction. Why shouldn't the protagonist be able to pass right through the event horizon of the black hole? How is the protagonist able to achieve a speed of 1 trillion times the speed of light?
You keep asking why it would work that way without presenting any reason that it wouldn't.
Why do black holes kill the protagonist? Because it was written that way. Why does a green rock weaken superman? Superman can fly, shrug off bullets, and defy the laws of physics.
As for how the protagonist can go as fast or faster than light, probably because it has no mass and is not a physical presence in the world. Not really sure why that is relevant because it still doesn't contradict the idea that it can be effected by black holes.
What exactly is your issue with this exactly? It isn't like black holes are some common cheap death. I'm really not seeing why this is such a sticking point for you. It is literally the only thing in the game that can kill you as far as I can tell.
I did present a reason as to why it wouldn't. Because the characteristics we know of a black hole interacting with mass and energy are based on real world physics, something that the protagonist is not bound to. Therefore, the protagonist has no reason to care about the existence of a black hole.
If you are saying that the protagonist has no mass and no physical presence, therefore no energy, then how exactly is it supposed to interact with black hole?
I just found it kind of odd that the black hole would interact with the protagonist when, as you said, "it has no physical presence in the universe." That's it. I would just like to conjure up some relevant discussion about something I am a little confused about.
Just so you know, light has no mass, it is still effected by black holes.
You are not presenting a reason it wouldn't work, you are just saying the protagonist doesn't abide by regular physics and then asking why black holes would kill it. Again, it's like me asking why a green rock could kill superman and then just repeating "but he can fly and lift heavy things" any time someone tries to explain it to you.
Stop with the "you haven't read what I said" bs. It's childish. I have read everything you said and I've been responding to what you said. Someone not agreeing with you doesn't mean they haven't heard your argument.