" persé; a lot of people just build that way because when you truly get into the game and start building games with 1rocket launch/s or 1+ purple science/s a bus just becomes convenient for stuff like a

's to have water as a resource. No mention of water cycle or realism. No one ever mentions these, and sacrificing realism in a game that doesn't have none to begin with seems like a small price to pay. As

Oprindeligt skrevet af Vyndicu:

Oprindeligt skrevet af BsTrAsH:

I just watcht a dokumentari about water Problems in our future (climate change) so i thought maybe it World be a nice ad to the game since

without interfering with the main progress.

AAI is a bit like yuoki (outside of adding a few more things to craft even for basic things), it gives you a nice toy box to play with, especially if you enjoy
programable things.
It is odly satisfying to send an army of tanks to destroy nests without leaving the comfort of your base.

Another fun thing to go for is to give yourself a few rules to follow, like using

Oprindeligt skrevet af anglefroghammer:

I'll vote for planting trees in the main game. That would be a fine solution for me I'll just build my own forest. However in real life your main pollution
advantageous if the planet is further from the sun and maybe trees can only survive in a certain temperature range. But I'll settle for having trees.

Like another poster said, I would not have thought

good fuel cell? [/quote]
That is literally what the recipe does - you take 10 depleted fuel cells, add 10 iron, 1 U235 and 13 U238 and get 10 brand new fuel cells.

Try thinking about it like green
circuit assemblers - they could be altered to use copper plates directly but it would be rather stupid to say that the game is bad because you need a 2nd assembler to make copper wires.

As well

A 2-track system should be enough in most cases, though a 4-track system gives you more room to 'store' trains in-transit. [/quote]

I like this because most people tend to design for the most compact
layout. That always seemed odd to me, because the game map is of unlimited size - why not make good use of all that space? Your design totally does that.

guaranteed death sentence for almost anything in the game. An enemy unit is ignited if it is hit directly by a flame stream. Flamethrower turrets will target the closest non ignited enemy and then once
firing.

The damage from the pools can also stack. It is quite possible for relatively weak enemies to die to the fire pools, but I think it's also likely that many of the deaths attributed to the fire

game is something we'll never touch, and even delete from our libraries.

Hogwash!

If they truly believed that, rather than just liking to be the center of attention with their own virtue posturing
learned a great deal about making their daily work better, and easier, and the game's program easier to work on now and change later. Finding such great help on their work they mentioned what they'd learned

Oprindeligt skrevet af shadain597:

I've got an ongoing Nullius run that's reached something like 70 hours and I still haven't completely drained some of the starting ore patches. I spent a
reserves to finally shoulder a somewhat proper 30 p/sec build for basic resources like graphite; plastic; iron; etc.

(Nullius is awesome!)

Oprindeligt skrevet af Nico:

Regarding Loaders ... it's just

.

Or, you can enter the map editor from the main menu, & build a world from a blank page.

My only options are Play or Map Editor.
Play starts a new game or campaign, neither of which allow any editing
change anything, like the ground or ores.

Can you please give me a more detailed way that you get to this map you can edit?


For editing instructions, the wiki has a page of info