Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You can either use 3 splitters & some belts ~ like this[i.imgur.com], or 1 splitter & a small combinator circuit wired to the in & out belts.
A 3-3 balancer is also pretty easy to make ~ this one[i.imgur.com] took only 1-2 minutes to design from scratch. (Or you can just use a 4-4 and loop one output back to an input.)
You can find lots of balancer designs online, I often refer to this compendium for the awkward ones (eg: 7-3, or other odd numbers).
TL;DR ~ a 3-way splitter would not add anything new, as the 2-way splitter can already be used to make any N-N belt arrangement required.