Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So, a team that is thorough, dedicated, taking a lot of flack because they believe in honest and forward advertising decided to deliberately lie about a small, mostly overlooked by people feature. For giggles, probably?
I get it, you are disappointed, but throwing around such accusations with no other basis than "I did not like this, so I want to attack someone" is... well, I was going to say nasty, but it's way, way worst than nasty. Behave yourself, sir.
Can't other people in your Family Share play Factorio at all?
If they can play it at all then I would say it did indeed work.
You really haven't provided any information about how it doesn't work, so I can't check whether your claims are true or false.
Khaylain: It won't join a multiplayer game, it states that the steam account doesn't own the game, go buy it. Which is true, but this would be the whole point of the Family Sharing.
Some details: I have a steam family of 4 accounts, 2 of them have their own copies of Factorio for a long time, recently bought 2 copies of the DLC for each. Wanted to play it online with one of those accounts and one different account that doesn't own the game individually.
For me it is very obvious and clear as day. And I would be just happy about it if the store page said the truth.
And as a father of two little kids I have very limited gaming time. I probably would have already purchased a 3rd copy instead of spending way too much time trying to troubleshoot this. Sadly I have more money than time so I really value if I am respected with honesty, and I wouldn't mind throwing money at a great dev team. But at this point I am not really enthusiastic about that.
EDIT: corrected details
I mean last time I checked the game itself asks for your account information once it has reached the main menu and it has a skip button that lets you play singleplayer(or directly connect to a multiplayer server that has account verification disabled). If steam is saying you don't own the game then you have a steam family configuration issue.
I understand the sentiment of some of you. Not a big deal. And I wouldn't expect any better from some random indie dev. But again these guys seem to be knowing what they are doing, and I would think that they got their fair share of value out of this project (I certainly hope so). And perhaps I should not care or waste my time on this. You know it's just that I was genuinely surprised by this whole thing from this dev. In my head they were one of the best devs really, and I find it hard to wrap my head around this stuff.
EDIT: The game itself saying not steam.
Corrected the quoted part in my previous post, which was incorrect on my part.
But I do agree that they should have a disclaimer about this on the store page.
+1
Thanks for taking the time to read my complaint and giving feedback guys!
I am not saying it does work. Though, as you yourself stated, it does. I am saying accusing someone of being intentionally malicious when your proof is limited to "I wanna" is despicable.
Family share never, ever let you play multiplayer in games that require external login and steam account link to work. It cannot. It will be the same in any game. It's not a bug, it's a decision. You might dislike it, and it might be hard to find proper info, that I will give you. I would even feel slightly bad if not for the calibre of accusations you used.
And in short what I said is that I don't -Think- that it is by mistake. It is an oppinion and it why my emotions are what they are. Tbh nobody needs to care about this part at all.
The problem is the fact part.
You saying I am malicious.. well, I was frustrated when after wasting some time I realized that I was mislead. Maybe I should have or shouldn't have or whatever, still I am the one who was mislead. And I am sure you could name some other parts of life where a misinformation like this could make people frustrated as well, or even more in some cases. And no, I don't feel like being polite when I was just made a fool of, but I am a good customer becasue I bought 2 copies of both the base game and the DLC, so there is that as well.
If you still think I am the bad guy here, so be it then.
There is no misinformation aside from your claim that you were lied to.
Coincidentally since I did not buy it just now I could have known that it is the case, but honestly I bought it years ago not much after it popped up on steam and I didn't remember.
And well, it is not technically unheard of that it could have worked even while needing an external account. Afterall many games in the family sharing considers another user (who doesn't individually own the game) an unrestrained user with their own cloud saves, progression and whatnot even to the point that in case they buy it in the future and leave the family group, they could still retain their progress and account. Seems to me that it can be as simple as a "owns the game: y/n" not considering the circumstances of the ownership.
So nope, I did not assume anything. I just read the store page.
I don't recall what the prior version was. To me, however, it wasn't 'too strongly worded' for my tastes. It was you experience to relay, not mine to relive. It may, or may not, have been more strongly worded than intended, probably from the frustration of the moment. How strongly worded it was, or is, doesn't alter the fact that you had a problem nor make the issue greater or lesser for the wording.
I'll have to mentally amend that to say it didn't work for you as you intended, since I've followed other threads where players were talking about the ways they have used it. If it works for them and not for you, either you are not doing something correctly, your account(s) are set up wrong, or you're expecting a 'feature' to be present which is not. That it 'works' and seems to work properly I'll take as a given and that the problem was other than it doesn't work properly. (Don't bother trying to explain the details, I don't know anything about family sharing and those details would be way over my head and waste your time to type them.)
I, too, find it surprising that a 'bug' of such magnitude is overlooked by WUBE. I'm even so surprised by this that I tend to think it's either user error or out of their control. A 'warning' on the store page might be a proper response. I cannot decide that, now or ever, as I'm never going to know enough about it to make an informed decision. However, family sharing is not a 'new' thing, Factorio is not a new game, and multiplayer has been a part of Factorio for more than a few years. If your case, as you see it, is common enough - either in occurrence or misunderstanding - I'd think such a warning/notice would already be there.
As it is more germane here, I'm jumping to the (currently) most recent post.
This is probably the root of the problem. You did assume something. If you'd 'just read the store page' and found nothing to clearly state what conditions must be met, or what limitations existed, and then acted as if your desired use was 'included', you assumed it was so. Skip the point of comparing what other games do, or don't do - every possible combination exists somewhere and you can probably find as many cases where your intentions work as others can find where they don't. Comparing them only enhances the assumption, it does not justify it.
Turn-about is fair game. Don't claim it don't work when it clearly does. Many players have used it successfully and Steam. presumably, has enabled it and verified that it works as intended. As intended by Steam and/or the developer, not as intended by a random user.
That you got an error message, or some form of notice, as to exactly what the problem was, and acknowledge that it was correct, suggests that 'the whole point of the Family Sharing' could be different than your assumptions about it. Again, what ever facts you didn't have at the time, the message is your first clue to find out what you didn't understand correctly.
Looking at the Steam help page for Family Sharing, I see two bullet points which seem to be exactly the issue.
I will guess that you've never installed a non-Steam version of the game. No reason you would have. As such, as near as my memory servers, the connection to the mod downloads, and the game's authentication with WUBE's multiplayer service are baked-in and you never see, and probably have no reason to know or suspect that there's any 'authentication' happening in the background. This could be a case where I'm making my own assumptions. Other games could require authentication and not have it work as seamlessly as WUBE does, and you could actually know that it's normal to need such to happen. Safe and more charitable, however, to think you don't know than to think you don't care.
I am curious, however, about one thing. When I play the game the map always shows a name as the 'character'. That name happens to be the same as my account name, and not something I've actually entered into the game like many others where, using some sort of plot device, the game prompts for the main character's name. When someone who does not own the game uses Family Sharing to play the game, is the engineer's name that of the game owner or the account accessing it through Family Sharing?
You're more charitable than I. Perhaps some of the retorts were sparked by the original wording, or not. Somehow this game attracts a larger than average share of people who frequently deal, for a living, with technology 'users' in one fashion or another. In those fields the most common 'error' is a euphemized version of 'problem exists between keyboard and chair'. That it is true does not remove the 'problem', it only directs the troubleshooting process. If the solution is user education, attacking the user won't solve the problem. Though, to toss in a mirror, I also don't understand why, with the opinions you express about the dev team in other regards, you'd jump to the conclusion that they mislead you or overlooked a 'bug' in their marketing.
I'm going to guess (assume) that, unsaid by you, there is also no place in the store page where it says that multiplayer is a feature in the family sharing options?
Since you keep coming back to the idea, in one fashion or another, that you were mislead, lied to, deceived, or tricked - what ever terms you should choose - I'll return to the 'by whom?' part. I think the misleading was done by your assumption of what does, or should, work, not by what was stated did work. "The problem is the fact part." So, keep to the available facts - as given by some source other than your expectations.
No such thing here. I'll not speak for others. Frustration and unmet expectations are never 'fun'.
Where on the store page does it say that multiplayer does not require an external account? And, just to be obnoxious, and turning to something I know nothing about, does the Steam Remote Play Together work with Factorio?
I'll go so far as to say it doesn't matter if you knew, knew and forgot, or didn't know. Once you got the error/notice from the game (WUBE) that the steam account doesn't own the game ought to have been the first clue that expectations and reality did not match and that information was lacking.
Assuming that 'this' works "here" implies 'that' works "everywhere", is a recipe for disappointment and frustration. If 'this' works "here", then wondering if 'that' works "there" is valid - and deserves to be investigated and tested. It does not translate to automatic success. Turning the water faucet with "C" on it usually gets me a nice cold glass of water (weather permitting). I do know, however, that such is not always the case. There are places where turning the knob with "C" on it could scald my hands.
I do believe that, by now, you know how to make things work to play the game you intended to play. Of course, the "moment" may have passed already as well. You know, now, what the error message meant, and why it was that way, and you can either use the other account, which does own it, or play a local (LAN) multiplayer game. (Or, as you've mentioned, you could get a 3rd copy. Seems a bit high-priced when there are other options, though.) I'm not expecting any changes in the wording of, or additions to, the store page.
Now, if I could only get someone to kick the damn soapbox out from under me.
It is as simple as "owns the game" which in your usecase is correctly answered with NO
Family sharing limitation, not Wubes fault so maybe dial back on those harsh critics and honestly, maybe stop lamenting here (waste more time?!)
Yes there could be a disclaimer about it but to be honest - there is no statement that you can quote (despite the feature flags MP and family sharing, which is merely saying that is has thoes features) that would say it works like you thought it would