Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Personally, anything above 1000 of each sci per minute is a "small megafactory". Less than that would just be a "large" factory.
I think that is roughly the point where everything needs to should be redesigned for mass-production in parallel assembly lines; efficient use of space; & low UPS costs.
Science packs consumed per minute = SPM (this is # of each, not aggregated.)
Rockets launched per minute = RPM
As a single rocket launch gives 1000 space sci, 1 rpm is equivalent to 1k spm.
However, I have seen some players use technology points per minute to compare factory output (TPM?).
Though this is harder to identify, as production module bonuses in laboratories are not included for the "production" statistics page ~ It only records sci packs produced / consumed, not the tech points produced from those packs, so a factory consuming 100 spm without prod modules in the labs would produce less tech points, thus research new techs slower, than another consuming 100 spm with prod modules in the labs.
Fish stack to 100, so 1 rpm = 100 fpm.
As far as I've seen, the consensus is that a 1 RPM base must *launch* a rocket/min whereas a 1kspm base must *consume* 1000 science/min.
There is a pretty big difference between those two things.