Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I can also recommend Nitrado[server.nitrado.net]
Thanks Jonnerz and Daniel
For a vanilla run I belive were running at under 4 GB, even on an MMO map (50+ players).
- gamed
- zap-hosting
- nitrado
gamed is ok till a certain point where 15 trains are running (each with 6 wagons) a 8 belt mainhub (each for copper, iron, green circuits, steel). it starts to become laggy.
zap-hosting and nitrado is (even with the big packages) unplayable. catching up ... catching up ... stuck.
I got a 200Mbit cable internet.
Anyone have a good (and tested) server host?
What are your experiences with ping perfect and low.ms? Which is better (even slightly).
I gave Ping Perfect a try. I'd say they're about the same as the experiences already mentioned. They worked with me to move us from their normal box to a high mhz, low core box to see if it would make any difference. It did, some, but not enough to keep us playing for long after.
Fingers crossed one of these day a Factorio Friday post says they've figured out how to multithread multiplayer.
I'm still using low.ms. Had a couple of issues last year (all resolved very quickly) but all very smooth this year, we've had some very large maps too... Would highly recommend them!
They do charge extra for "Unlimited RAM" but all the standard options have been fine for us, I think they use very high mhz processors.