Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Ahh yes, the classic "length is more important than quality" argument that still makes no sense
Sorry to say but your logic is also flawed, going by that you could ask what you like as long as the quality is good.
Length =/= Quality.
No it isn't. The subjectivity of taste doesn't override the general rule of "quality over quantity" since it's illogical to disagree with that rule regardless of your preferences. Whether you like style A or style B, it still doesn't make sense to pick "long average game" over "shorter great game". Besides, just think of all the 60-80 dollar games that are 15 hours or even less in many cases.
I agree. So if this game is, for the sake of argument, 20 hours long, how is paying 2 dollars per hour of gameplay asking too much? How often do you really see people complaining that a $60 USD game has a playtime of 30 hours? As long as they liked the game, I doubt that happens often.
(Also it is a Super Nintendo game BEFORE the Golden age of JRPG's)
it's 2019 if people still don't realise....
2 words "portal 2" 7h, best 60 + bucks i spent on a fresh release
I beat Chrono Trigger my first try in only 18 hours and I wouldn't want that game to be any longer. Bonus content is one thing but I think people are talking about the main story.
My man