Resident Evil 7 Biohazard

Resident Evil 7 Biohazard

檢視統計資料:
Chris Redfield Not a Hero?
Looks like all those fools that doubted it are no longer around magically. What a shocker.

Anyway, anyone have thoughts on what the DLC is going to be about or theroies?

Not a hero title combined with Chris Redfield being in an Umbrella Helicopter leaves a lot of speclatuion on the table, even though this was already discussed at launch a lot, we can now discuss it without constant fools coming in saying 'its not chris' over and over.
最後修改者:(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★; 2017 年 3 月 1 日 下午 6:31
引用自 Disko Lemonade:
I was scrolling through my comment history, saw this thread, and want to be the guy that revives it so everyone can laugh at this Mohammed dude for being super duper wrong a bunch of times
< >
目前顯示第 316-330 則留言,共 577
Punkin Spice 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 1:48 
引用自 Skittles
Wesker being alive still would honestly be the dumbest decision they've ever made. I'm hoping RE7 is them going a much better direction with the story and not making obnoxiously stupid twists like that.

Seriously I would rather have Marcus singing to leeches again than have Wesker come back to life again (again).

Well.... just keep in mind we are talking about a company that infected the whole world in their series, destroyed umbrella entirely and brought it back, killed characters and brought them back, made VERY questionable timelime canons..... I mean.... I wouldn't be surprised if Wesker is still alive.... id just be like dope, my favorite bad guy that got ruined at the end of RE5 is back!
We'll agree to disagree on Wesker's likability.

That said though, RE7's a completely different writer so... here's hoping. The whole game seems like a soft reboot done right, so there's a good chance things will be smoother from here on out.
(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★ 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 1:48 
引用自 Lanzagranadas
Also, since Capcom wanted to stupidly run that game as canon saying it happened after RE6 that goes on confirming that Wesker is still alive and is canon..... ugh Capcom why u do dis?

That game doesn't confirm anything. Wesker's voice can only be heared sometimes during online missions, which have no story at all, it's just an easter egg. The only "story" and timeline Umbrella Corps has is the single player mode called The Experiment, and there's no Wesker's voice nor anything pointing that Wesker is alive there. There are only mentions to a misterious man referred to as "The Commander" which doesn't need to be Wesker because he was never called that way.

Well, since they wrote the game off as canon and the multiplayer is you as Umbrella fighting off other corporations trying to steal samples also that still makes it count as part of the canon.

If not simply provide proof otherwise. Because I can easily just say look at ME3 and its multiplayer. Its canon to the main game and that isnt the only game that pulls off canon from multiplayer experiences.
最後修改者:(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★; 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 1:49
Tommy Reslin 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 1:53 
引用自 Skittles

Well.... just keep in mind we are talking about a company that infected the whole world in their series, destroyed umbrella entirely and brought it back, killed characters and brought them back, made VERY questionable timelime canons..... I mean.... I wouldn't be surprised if Wesker is still alive.... id just be like dope, my favorite bad guy that got ruined at the end of RE5 is back!
We'll agree to disagree on Wesker's likability.

That said though, RE7's a completely different writer so... here's hoping. The whole game seems like a soft reboot done right, so there's a good chance things will be smoother from here on out.

Again, agreed. I've been defending RE7 because it's a big change, big move, and a big risk. I want to be supportive here because if the fans aren't supportive and if the company hasn't been happy with RE's direction and the reviews. It's possible they might simply scrap the franchise. RE7 is a huge step in the right direction and it took a lot of courage for changing up the formula. For that I say to capcom. Bravo.
(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★ 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 1:56 
引用自 Tommy Reslin
引用自 Skittles
We'll agree to disagree on Wesker's likability.

That said though, RE7's a completely different writer so... here's hoping. The whole game seems like a soft reboot done right, so there's a good chance things will be smoother from here on out.

Again, agreed. I've been defending RE7 because it's a big change, big move, and a big risk. I want to be supportive here because if the fans aren't supportive and if the company hasn't been happy with RE's direction and the reviews. It's possible they might simply scrap the franchise. RE7 is a huge step in the right direction and it took a lot of courage for changing up the formula. For that I say to capcom. Bravo.

I defintiely prefer this. As much as I LOVE the playstyle of the original series and the playstyle of 4 and 5 (screw 6), I extremely like the new feel... I had strong vibes of being like the original just in first person and man was it amazing for me. Whatever they choose to do though, I just hope it isn't another mainstory (0-6) that doesnt ruin everything completely like 6.
Super Smiley 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 2:00 
引用自 Super Smiley

Don't know why it didn't let me copy and paste all of it But yeah I was sure there were a lot of horror games in the past that took place in a spooky house besides P.T. :D

I mean wasn't one the old Clock Tower games one of them?

RE1 in 1996 and Alone in the Dark in 1992 and Haunted House in 1981 if we want to go THAT far. xD

Totally forgot about the Alone in the Dark games!! :D Nice catch!! I am not sure I played Haunted House though lol. But yeah if Resident Evil 7 copies anything it was only small elements from other games like F.E.A.R. But I think someone who wrote F.E.A.R. worked on Resident Evil 7. I am not sure if that true or not.
Lanzagranadas 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 2:00 
Well, since they wrote the game off as canon and the multiplayer is you as Umbrella fighting off other corporations that still makes it count as part of the canon.

You don't play as anyone from Umbrella, you play as a generic soldier from a generic organization performing random missions while fighting against other players. There's no story in the MP mode, you're just "someone" working for some organization, doing some mission in some quarantined place.

The Experiment does actually have a background story (nothing to brag about but a story nonetheless) and even a concrete timeline, but the multiplayer missions just can't be canon because they simply have no plot at all.
Tommy Reslin 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 2:02 
引用自 Tommy Reslin

Again, agreed. I've been defending RE7 because it's a big change, big move, and a big risk. I want to be supportive here because if the fans aren't supportive and if the company hasn't been happy with RE's direction and the reviews. It's possible they might simply scrap the franchise. RE7 is a huge step in the right direction and it took a lot of courage for changing up the formula. For that I say to capcom. Bravo.

I defintiely prefer this. As much as I LOVE the playstyle of the original series and the playstyle of 4 and 5 (screw 6), I extremely like the new feel... I had strong vibes of being like the original just in first person and man was it amazing for me. Whatever they choose to do though, I just hope it isn't another mainstory (0-6) that doesnt ruin everything completely like 6.

They did say they understand people like the old style and the third person style in a recent interview and they aren't ditching it entirely. In a perfect world I'd like:

Resident Evil Revelations (Continue this spin off series where it's in RE4-5 style.)
Remakes (They're already remaking 2. Hopefully the remakes remain in the old style.)
Resident Evil main games (Stick to first person survival horror at least until RE9)

This will please all the fans they've created. Now I do think they'll stick to first person survival horror until at least RE9. Here's my evidence regarding that..

Resident Evil 1-2-3: Classic controls/style.

Resident Evil 4-5-6: Third person over the shoulder camera.

They did something slightly different with three (quick turn, able to evade attacks, etc.)

They did something slightly different with six (Even more action and more scenario's.)

So if they follow patterns we'll have 7-8-9 with some modifications to 9's structure.
Super Smiley 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 2:11 
The problem with 3rd person view like previous Resident Evil games had, it makes the game less scary in my opinion. No way I am saying a game can't be scary in 3rd person view, but it is also much easier to make a scary game in first person view than 3rd person view. That's what I think at least. On another note, Resident Evil 7 is a true VR game. So if we want to embrace more Resident Evil VR games, some might have to get used to first person view unless Capcom allows you to play the game in 2 different modes, which I doubt they will do.
(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★ 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 2:27 
引用自 Super Smiley

RE1 in 1996 and Alone in the Dark in 1992 and Haunted House in 1981 if we want to go THAT far. xD

Totally forgot about the Alone in the Dark games!! :D Nice catch!! I am not sure I played Haunted House though lol. But yeah if Resident Evil 7 copies anything it was only small elements from other games like F.E.A.R. But I think someone who wrote F.E.A.R. worked on Resident Evil 7. I am not sure if that true or not.

Oh dont credit me on that nice catch! It was Tommy that brought that up. I completely missed that one too!
Punkin Spice 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 2:27 
引用自 Super Smiley
The problem with 3rd person view like previous Resident Evil games had, it makes the game less scary in my opinion. No way I am saying a game can't be scary in 3rd person view, but it is also much easier to make a scary game in first person view than 3rd person view. That's what I think at least. On another note, Resident Evil 7 is a true VR game. So if we want to embrace more Resident Evil VR games, some might have to get used to first person view unless Capcom allows you to play the game in 2 different modes, which I doubt they will do.
I think what always bothered me was stuff like not being able to see enemies that are directly in front of me. If you want to surprise me, thats fine. If you want the player to be punished for recklessness, thats also fine (I mean I'm a Souls fanatic after all)

But getting grabbed by an enemy a foot away from my face cause the camera wouldn't let me see it? Nah that was irritating, not frightening.
(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★ 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 2:30 
引用自 Lanzagranadas
Well, since they wrote the game off as canon and the multiplayer is you as Umbrella fighting off other corporations that still makes it count as part of the canon.

You don't play as anyone from Umbrella, you play as a generic soldier from a generic organization performing random missions while fighting against other players. There's no story in the MP mode, you're just "someone" working for some organization, doing some mission in some quarantined place.

The Experiment does actually have a background story (nothing to brag about but a story nonetheless) and even a concrete timeline, but the multiplayer missions just can't be canon because they simply have no plot at all.


Multiplayer is one side is Umbrella (your side always) and the opposing team is suppose to be a rival company. Like I said earlier, provide proof otherwise and I'll simply say you made your point but until then I still consider it canon like I consider ME3 MP to be canon and there is zero story there too but its still canon and they have no plot at all as well but yet its still canon to ME3. That isn't the only game to do that also so until proven wrong I'm simply marking MP as canon to a game considered canon.
Super Smiley 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 3:00 
引用自 Skittles
引用自 Super Smiley
The problem with 3rd person view like previous Resident Evil games had, it makes the game less scary in my opinion. No way I am saying a game can't be scary in 3rd person view, but it is also much easier to make a scary game in first person view than 3rd person view. That's what I think at least. On another note, Resident Evil 7 is a true VR game. So if we want to embrace more Resident Evil VR games, some might have to get used to first person view unless Capcom allows you to play the game in 2 different modes, which I doubt they will do.
I think what always bothered me was stuff like not being able to see enemies that are directly in front of me. If you want to surprise me, thats fine. If you want the player to be punished for recklessness, thats also fine (I mean I'm a Souls fanatic after all)

But getting grabbed by an enemy a foot away from my face cause the camera wouldn't let me see it? Nah that was irritating, not frightening.

Some tend to forget that the Resident Evil games weren't a 10 out of 10 back in the day. They had their flaws. One of the major flaws back then was the bad camera angles. This video kind of makes fun of it but proves a point lol.

Start at 1:27

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLRNbNBNtgg&index=5&list=LLwcvm9os0Hb1p3F4vhGXgYA
Frag Maniac 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 3:05 
引用自 Super Smiley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLRNbNBNtgg&index=5&list=LLwcvm9os0Hb1p3F4vhGXgYA
LOL, even when Sessler had hair, he didn't really have hair.
Tayzor Azul 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 3:42 
引用自 Bogard
they photographed real objects from different angles and then they put them in the game and also they used real persons as a models and put them in the game, so Chris model is Georgie Dandy, that's why he doesn't look like the old Chris
So once again, Capcom has ripped off from Kojima! 1st P.T., now Death Stranding.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=884613840
You must be retarded if you thing Kojima invented photogrametry.
Gaige the Invincible 2017 年 3 月 16 日 下午 3:47 
引用自 Bogard
So once again, Capcom has ripped off from Kojima! 1st P.T., now Death Stranding.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=884613840

3D Photogrammetry has been used in video games even before P.T came out :steamfacepalm:

Stop making up stuff because of this butthurt crap about RE7's success. There is nothing that any of you haters can do about it anymore.
Yeah and some people still don't know that's why people keep making stuff ; p
< >
目前顯示第 316-330 則留言,共 577
每頁顯示: 1530 50

張貼日期: 2017 年 3 月 1 日 下午 6:31
回覆: 577