The Killers Mistake argument.

[Marusame]

Am I the only one that got bent over a barrel with this question? I feel you either noticed it right away or was destroyed by this argument.

I spent nearly a half hour failing like 50+ times trying to deduce what it was trying to say. Hindsight is 20/20 immediately after finding out what it was but i feel every single thing that was mentioned was refutable or ONE of the mistakes that should have been pointed out like the 4 gown and the 4 rooms which was never brought up.

[Runa Silvertongue]

Are you talking about the Chapter 3 trial, or Chapter 4? When you say gown, are you referring to Hiyoko's kimono? And what 4 rooms?

Sorry if my tone comes across as a little snarky, but your post didn't mention which particular trial you were in.

[Marusame]

Originally posted by Debra Kadabra:

Are you talking about the Chapter 3 trial, or Chapter 4? When you say gown, are you referring to Hiyoko's kimono? And what 4 rooms?

Sorry if my tone comes across as a little snarky, but your post didn't mention which particular trial you were in.

Well I was trying to not be spoilery but i suppose I can use spoiler text
I was talking about the whole Mikan/Ibuki thing, the hospital gowns, they even made a point to talk about how one was missing (the one the killer was wearing) and how there are only 4 one for each one and there were 3 patients which was never brought up.

There was just so much evidence unused that the killers mistake argument to me was like, they made like 50 mistakes and the answer was the camera angle, but honestly the gown and slippers were also mistakes, literally everything the killer said was a mistake and nearly every truth bullet applied and nearly every gold word was refutable... it was a nightmare I had to finally give in and look it up after about a half hour on that ONE part.

[Caulfieldd]

I agree that it was kinda hard to figure out.

But there's a spoiler forum here, specifically created for spoiler topics. ^^
You don't have to censor text over there, so feel free to discuss things there.
Just a suggestion. This isn't meant to be an angry comment, or something xD

[Runa Silvertongue]

Originally posted by Marusame:

Well I was trying to not be spoilery but i suppose I can use spoiler text
I was talking about the whole Mikan/Ibuki thing, the hospital gowns, they even made a point to talk about how one was missing (the one the killer was wearing) and how there are only 4 one for each one and there were 3 patients which was never brought up.

There was just so much evidence unused that the killers mistake argument to me was like, they made like 50 mistakes and the answer was the camera angle, but honestly the gown and slippers were also mistakes, literally everything the killer said was a mistake and nearly every truth bullet applied and nearly every gold word was refutable... it was a nightmare I had to finally give in and look it up after about a half hour on that ONE part.

It's hard NOT to be spoilery about that trial.

This trial in particular was a rush job due to the fact that, at the 11th hour, the second victim was changed from Fuyuhiko to Hiyoko. What may have been clearer before that may have gotten muddier due to the fact that the weapon used to kill Hiyoko wasn't even brought up during the trial, but it's implied that Mikan used a scalpel.

As to the other issues, who knows? They could have gotten muddy on purpose. I don't know for sure.