Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
If you're not using legacy randomisation, then idk. Lucky, or cheating, can't say.
The other best way to make money early on is fishing, but you can't get 50k from that in 7 days when starting from level 1.
You really use a cheat as an argument that its possible to earn X on spring 7? Of course its possible with cheats, even on day 1 6:00am.
I just said it was possible. And you'll note that I only played it for 4 in-game days, just for fun, to see what would happen, then I deleted it. I play alone so...
I dont care if anyone cheats. That its possible with cheating is a no brainer.
People lie. You need to find the truth before you ask. NEVER ask someone about a topic involving their own ethic or honesty without already having evidence. This is how police do it. They already know the answer to 80% of the questions they are asking you. They are asking them to determine whether they can trust your answers to the other 20% of the questions, and to figure out what you will and will not admit to. And to demonstrate your lack of remorse and desire to save yourself no matter what as a flaw of bad moral character. Everybody lies.
Everybody lies. The only option when truth matters is to already either know the truth or have a series of facts which paint an incomplete truth.
Don't just ask someone "did you cheat", start by gathering evidence, with the attempt to prove they did NOT cheat. After you have disqualified all other options, the only one left is "they cheated". Then you confront them, and as they attempt to work out how they did it without cheating, you already have all the refutations needed, and the data to back up your refutations. Then you can coax them into admitting HOW they cheated, and WHY.
Only then can you hope to have an honest dialogue "don't do that, not with this!"
EDIT: And if they are able to work out how they didn't cheat, and can demonstrate how they were able to accomplish it without cheating, you can make the determination as to whether or not the method they used constitutes as exploiting/cheating by the definition of the agreement everyone made.
And if everyone didn't agree, nobody cheated even with CJB Item Spawner. Cheating is "intentionally breaking the agreed upon rules, usually to gain an advantage". This is also why it's important to use a rule wording that is objective. When you just say "no cheating", one player might have a different opinion of what cheating is. If you use more concrete language you can get them all to understand it. "That Guy" will always try to use semantics to find a loophole "well you didn't name that as cheating".
Rather than just "don't cheat guys!", look to encourage an honest playstyle that names what the expectations are, and what violates them.
[857][857][857]
8k a pop.
Holy moly! I'd not have known about the value of Tiger Slime Eggs. However, I won't start a new game with that info. My experience with the Prismatic Shards made the game too easy. I just did it for amusement.
If you could *somehow* spawn in Fully Hearted Ostrich, you could make 20k a pop.
you are aware that looking into someone's pc without their consent is a crime right?
how can you talk about ethics when endorsing a crime. police need a warrant to look into your pc.