Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's incorrect, desert unlock year 1 spring has been a thing for years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZr9SPQy7ac&t=351s
Yet here you are, enjoying the fruits of technology of people who care about accuracy, precision and optimization. But you pity those kinds of people? Oki doki
He said it's not feasible without cheating or modding, which is not correct. Are you suggesting min maxing is cheating? "Not normal"?
This is a fair point but calling the style of play in itself not normal just screams immaturity. I could say that a player managing to get only 1000 gold in spring 1 and gets perfection in year 27 is not normal, but I don't. So when someone says you need to cheat to accomplish bus in spring 1, and I suggest you don't need to cheat and it is feasible with strong play, the only point I'm making is people should open their eyes to the possible. Even without the methods you refer to it is possible. Will most people do it? No, but why is that not normal? Seems to me like the crowd who says "play however you want, take as much time as you need" get upset real quick when someone suggests they can play optimally.