Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Furthermore, I'm not whining, I'm asking a company to do something I'd like. Obviously it's their decision as to whether or not to do it; I'm just informing them that I (and Microbit, and Pindaiba, and Nagel) would like a native Linux version.
It isn't a gaming platform though.. That's why I also said Linux is my favorite OS, I'm not bashing it.
If you refuse to run it through wine (I truly do not understand your reasoning for this, it works fine), then sadly you will be waiting for a while, that is why the posters posted what they did.
The "company" you are asking for help, is actually 1 person. One single person works on the entire game. He is still working on some bugs that exist, adding a few new things, and a multiplayer version. While having native Linux support might get him an extra 1% sales (since it's not natively a gaming platform) it really wouldn't be worth his time to do so right now, and if I were him I would make the same choice.
What is your issue running the game through wine anyway? I'm honestly curious.
What does that MEAN? It's an operating system. It provides an interface to the hardware: CPU hardware, memory, disks, network interfaces, GPUs. People write software that works with that interface. Some of that software is intended to be used interactively for entertainment. I currently own 88 such pieces of software. The ONLY difference between Linux and any other OS for gaming is that many game companies have decided not to release games for it.
So, again: what do you mean by "natively a game platform"? Is Windows natively a game platform? No. It's a general purpose operating system. PS3/OS is "natively a game platform". XBox One OS is "natively a game platform".
My issue is this: I use Linux for work. I dislike Windows. I would prefer it if I could play more games on Linux. The reason there aren't a lot of games on Linux is marketshare, as you've said. I don't want to be a datapoint on the Windows side, even though I'm actually using Linux, which is what happens when you run Steam in Wine. I also don't want to encourage developers to use single-platform frameworks like XNA when there are cross-platform frameworks like MonoGame, Unity, Allegro, SDL, and SFML, just to name the few I've used.
Ah I see. That's what I was mostly curious about.
I assume you also want devs to lean toward vulkan as opposed to dx12? I understand the idea behind your theory, but I'm not sure holding off on a game that you want to play simply because you don't want your machine to look like a windows client when it logs in is the way to go to accomplish your goal.
That is obviously your decision, and what I was confused about in the conversation. Best of luck to you! Hopefully CA will be able to squeeze out a Linux version for you in the not too distant future.
" I understand the idea behind your theory, but I'm not sure holding off on a game that you want to play simply because you don't want your machine to look like a windows client when it logs in is the way to go to accomplish your goal."
That's kind of the problem: what other way would you suggest? As a consumer, my ONLY power is "voting with my wallet".
There is a very good chance of a Linux port, as in that very thread a veteran developer who has A) ported many games in the past and B) developed an open source XNA implementation, FNA - has already stated his interest in the project. More info - https://www.gamingonlinux.com/articles/want-to-see-the-very-popular-stardew-valley-on-linux-theres-a-chance.6744
This is the main reason why there are gamers that use Linux... its the edgy emo kid in school that always wanted to be different and rage against the machine.
I use Linux because I am a software developer. All my software runs, in the end, on Linux; therefor, it is far easier to develop on Linux as well. In addition, more and better tooling for C, C++, Javascrip, and Elm development is available on Unix-likes. The only thing I would ever use a Windows installation for is gaming. There are so few games that are Windows-only that I really want to play, that I'd rather forego them than have to deal with dual booting, or having multiple computers. Please refrain from insulting people just because you disagree with them.
But there's more to it than that... you just said you don't want to use wine... I use Linux for work too and no bloody way I'd use it for anything but work, its the most unituitive platform I've ever had the pleasure of using... And I started way back with MS-DOS and windows 3.1
Yes. If you read back a few posts, you'll see I explained why.
And, I respectfully disagree with you: I find Linux (specifically Ubuntu with XFCE desktop) to be highly intuitive. Again, the fact that you personally dislike a platform is grounds only for you not to use it, not for the developer not to release for it.
In what way is asking for a native port irritating?
I find people assuming WINE is the solution to gaming on *nix much more irritating. Relying on a translation layer in order to play new games is counterintuitive, and adds another whole layer for bugs / issues to creep in on. Supporting modern and ongoing game development is out of the scope of the WINE project.
Yay! :"D
Looking forward to a port