安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題已被鎖定 
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
The real reason for developers changing graphics is simply because the Red Cross is a legally established trademark registered in several different countries. ;)
well thats how it comes with stupid laws in place, just wait till someone makes a trademark for farts...
https://www.nexusmods.com/stardewvalley/mods/3078
It might seem silly but that law is there to protect both the red cross workers and the people that they serve.
Next up Médecins Sans Frontières will be suing Konami for creating Militares Sans Frontiers etc etc etc..
..good thing they're in the business of helping people, not hindering them, right?
green color mostly use for heal or heart point
Let's calm down and don't do anything rash, take a deep breath please!
And it's in fact the application of Article 53 of the first convention, which has lead to the minor change.
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Article.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=F4C0BCFA43AA7067C12563CD0051A306
It's not copyright. It's protection against misuse in any form. Even for fictional institutions with the same purpose (in this case, the "hospital" is more like an doctors office, used by Harvey a fictional *private* (!) person, who also would have violated the convention, if he were real). There might be exceptions for historical documentation, which is not the case here.
So the "outrage" for this minor graphical thing is rather silly (thouth some seemed to be "ironically"outraged). The cause may seem ridiculous, too, but it may be a good idea to enforce this article out of principle.
EDIT:
This statement from the canadian red cross was released last year:
https://www.redcross.ca/about-us/about-the-canadian-red-cross/red-cross-emblem/it-may-just-be-a-game-to-you-but-it-means-the-world-to-us
It's definitely Article 53! Additionally, article 54 states: "The High Contracting Parties shall, if their legislation is not already adequate, take measures necessary for the prevention and repression, at all times, of the abuses referred to under Article 53".
So, the copyright is not part of the Geneva Convention afaik, but is used to help enforcing Article 53.