Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
If tomato was a fruit, instead of becoming tomato juice in a keg, it'd become tomato wine.
If eggplant was a fruit, instead of getting pickled eggplant, you'd get eggplant jelly.
Rhubarb pie is more akin to an apple or cherry pie.
Pumpkin pie is more akin to a sweet potato pie.
Plus would it even be possible to just make them into exceptions like pale ale?
(Also just ... ketchup ...)
*On a side note, I didn't even know pickled pumpkins were an actual thing ...*
Cucumbers are fruits, corn is a fruit and I believe peas are too ...
Yet it is usually ALSO considered as vegetables as its uses in kitchens are more likely a veggie
What you're all saying is the same as saying ants and wasps/bees aren't related because ant don't have wings (except for nuptial flights in which king and queen ants have wings for a while)
Botanically, tomatoes are fruits, because they have seeds.
Nutrioually, it's a vegetable, since it's low on sugar and calories.
In the kitchen it's a vegetable, since it's used in much the same way other vegetables are used, but can usually not fulfill the role of a fruit.
These definitions are all valid, and in a vacuum, all three of them are based on entirely arbitrary characteristics. There's no reason why the fact that they have seeds should matter more than the fact that they're low on calories, unless we're trying to create botanical categories based on those characteristics.
Of course if we're speaking in generalized terms, without any obvious context, we would probably go with the botanical definition (since it's the one that attempts to categorize them scientifically), but that's not the way the term vegetable is applied in Stardew. So what needs to be looked at here is in which context the tomato is being categorized in.
So what is the categorization used for in Stardew? Well, as somebody already said, it's used to determine what happens when it's processed, so we're clearly in the realm of nutrition/cooking (ingredients) here. The definition that was chosen makes perfect sense for the context.