RTX 3070 and 3600x - Incredibly low FPS on Caspian no matter which graphical settings I use.

[certified brain genius]

Boop. Am I alone?

[Ghostvenger92]

idk man, i have a Ryzen 7 1700 overclocked as far as it can and a Rx 5600xt with sliders maxed out and i been running this game at 1440p with the settings before Extreme at 60+fps with some dips depending on area except for the valley map, that map goes into the 40's on average

[SkepticJoker]

Not really on topic but the YouTube channel Hardware Unboxed recently made a video revealing some interesting scenarios were a RX 5700XT can out perform a RTX 3070.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLEIJhunaW8

[SkepticJoker]

Can you use check core utilization and see if all your cores are hitting 90-100% usage?
Check out this other interesting video that shows how a CPU bottleneck can destroy the performance of what should be a better GPU.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWmConRMbD4

[Nite69]

Ghostvenger92 a écrit :

idk man, i have a Ryzen 7 1700 overclocked as far as it can and a Rx 5600xt with sliders maxed out and i been running this game at 1440p with the settings before Extreme at 60+fps with some dips depending on area except for the valley map, that map goes into the 40's on average

Yea the valley is demanding too I remember that one, seems like everyone is hitting the 40's on that as well as the desert during daytime so I guess the system don't matter

hopefully the enhanced version later will fix the performance on both of them

[Desolate Eden]

Lowest I get there is about 65 and mostly average between 70-80 and sometimes go up to around 90-120, im on a 3080 though and with an i7 10700k

thats at max settings, at 1440p and with ray tracing and dlss on

[Ghostvenger92]

Desolate Eden a écrit :

Lowest I get there is about 65 and mostly average between 70-80 and sometimes go up to around 90-120, im on a 3080 though and with an i7 10700k

thats at max settings, at 1440p and with ray tracing and dlss on

seems something is up with his CPU plus he has a 3070 and choosing to play at 1080p with his ryzen 5 3600x, some games just require more cores and threads to run smoothly these days

[SkepticJoker]

Desolate Eden a écrit :

Lowest I get there is about 65 and mostly average between 70-80 and sometimes go up to around 90-120, im on a 3080 though and with an i7 10700k

thats at max settings, at 1440p and with ray tracing and dlss on

You should try to compare the quality/performance of 1080p no DLSS, and 1440p DLSS. In my opinion, 1080p no DLSS looks better and runs better compared to 1440p DLSS.

[Desolate Eden]

SkepticJoker a écrit :

Desolate Eden a écrit :

Lowest I get there is about 65 and mostly average between 70-80 and sometimes go up to around 90-120, im on a 3080 though and with an i7 10700k

thats at max settings, at 1440p and with ray tracing and dlss on

You should try to compare the quality/performance of 1080p no DLSS, and 1440p DLSS. In my opinion, 1080p no DLSS looks better and runs better compared to 1440p DLSS.

I'm finding the game looks great with dlss and rtx at 1440p, obvs i cant compare as I dont have a 1080p monitor, but ive taken plenty of screenshots and im blown away by how it looks, im getting 100+ fps on max settings in all the areas so far except the desert so im happy with the performance for now

[SkepticJoker]

Ghostvenger92 a écrit :

seems something is up with his CPU plus he has a 3070 and choosing to play at 1080p with his ryzen 5 3600x, some games just require more cores and threads to run smoothly these days

You do realize that playing at 1440p instead of 1080p won't net any extra frame rate. If going from 1080p to 1440p brings the GPU usage to 99%. The CPU usage won't decrease because of the lower resolution, it will decrease because the CPU is waiting for the GPU to finish rendering at a higher resolution.

[SkepticJoker]

Desolate Eden a écrit :

SkepticJoker a écrit :

You should try to compare the quality/performance of 1080p no DLSS, and 1440p DLSS. In my opinion, 1080p no DLSS looks better and runs better compared to 1440p DLSS.

I'm finding the game looks great with dlss and rtx at 1440p, obvs i cant compare as I dont have a 1080p monitor, but ive taken plenty of screenshots and im blown away by how it looks, im getting 100+ fps on max settings in all the areas so far except the desert so im happy with the performance for now

Suit yourself, but you won't even try and see if 1080p no DLSS looks and runs better?

[Desolate Eden]

SkepticJoker a écrit :

Desolate Eden a écrit :

I'm finding the game looks great with dlss and rtx at 1440p, obvs i cant compare as I dont have a 1080p monitor, but ive taken plenty of screenshots and im blown away by how it looks, im getting 100+ fps on max settings in all the areas so far except the desert so im happy with the performance for now

Suit yourself, but you won't even try and see if 1080p no DLSS looks and runs better?

dont have a 1080p monitor, downscaling from 1440p to 1080p looks really bad and well, i dont think id ever play at 1080p with an rtx 3080 anyway

[Nite69]

Ghostvenger92 a écrit :

Desolate Eden a écrit :

Lowest I get there is about 65 and mostly average between 70-80 and sometimes go up to around 90-120, im on a 3080 though and with an i7 10700k

thats at max settings, at 1440p and with ray tracing and dlss on

seems something is up with his CPU plus he has a 3070 and choosing to play at 1080p with his ryzen 5 3600x, some games just require more cores and threads to run smoothly these days

he has plenty of cores threads for this game, a 3600x is a 6 core, 12 thread and only should be using between 30 - 50% on this game, I am on a 2600x which is also 6 core, 12 thread and thats what mine does, he is not bottlenecked at all

[VICTORY]

I'm dealing with unplayable stuttering on a 3090. Any suggestions?

[Nite69]

VICTORY a écrit :

I'm dealing with unplayable stuttering on a 3090. Any suggestions?

thats a game issue not your card, same happens to me

[John Price]

Stupid ending bruh