Dishonored 2 is no where near the disaster Arkham Knight, AC Unity and No Man's Sky were

[Neto]

I see the problems are really bad, and a lot of people doesn't accept a game that in some moments fall from rock solid 60fps.

But with the Process Lasso thing and some tweaks in the NVidia Control Panel the game is pretty much enjoyable.

I see some people comparing Dishonored 2 with Batman Arkham Knight and even No Man's Sky and this is simply a lie.

I'm sorry for people who can't even open the game (who are a minority) and those who have crashes at some points... but most of us can play the game.

Arkham Knight was laggy and came with missing effects and textures, AC Unity had very bad performance and was filled with bugs for most people, and No Man's Sky... well, it's No Man's Sky...

Dishonored 2 is awesome, and I trully believe the devs will fix the problems. Right now the game is playable. Not perfect, but playable, with some tweaks.

[Larry]

It's worse than those listed games.

NMS shouldn't even come into the equation given the issues with that game were the blatant lies and promises the developers made prior to release. The game actually ran and did, loosely, what it said on the tin. It was a ♥♥♥♥ game that never should have been priced at €60 or even €30.

Arkham Knight had a lot of issues BUT those were mainly tied to VRAM issues so people's ♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6GB of VRAM on a 980Ti couldn't max the game out or run it in 1440p and their 3.5GB VRAM 970 was completely ♥♥♥♥♥♥(Still is for quite a few people). The game itself you could actually run for the most part and, like Dishonored 2, a few people could run it without problems. However, there was serious issues with driving in Arkham Knight regardless which was fixed. It was a ♥♥♥♥ port but it was definitely comparable to this ♥♥♥♥ port(Which also crashes on consoles and has frame drops).

AC Unity was buggy but still playable(PS4 simply couldn't handle it and averaged at 24FPS). It also had a lot going on and, an almost three year old game, looked ten times better than Dishonored 2 does.

Dishonored 2 has some of the most unheard of issues ranging from weird mouse glitches which make people physically sick to odd refresh rate problems to the point people are getting headaches from playing for thirty minutes or more. Then there's the blatant performance issues: Hanging for hours on the loading screen, frequent dips to single digit FPS, terrible performance ON ALL RANGES OF HARDWARE(1080's can't run the damn thing for crying out loud!), stuttering, micro stutter, textures failing to load, the game crashes.

What could have gone wrong went wrong with this game. Things that no one could have possibly thought that could have gone wrong went wrong.

So how about you get back in your box and suck on a grape. We're all thrilled the game works fine for you but, reality check, A ♥♥♥♥ LOAD OF US CAN'T RUN THE GAME OR PLAY IT BECAUSE IT RUNS LIKE ♥♥♥♥!

[ramyland_maelstrom]

Dr.Larry님이 먼저 게시:

It's worse than those listed games.

NMS shouldn't even come into the equation given the issues with that game were the blatant lies and promises the developers made prior to release. The game actually ran and did, loosely, what it said on the tin. It was a ♥♥♥♥ game that never should have been priced at €60 or even €30.

Arkham Knight had a lot of issues BUT those were mainly tied to VRAM issues so people's ♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6GB of VRAM on a 980Ti couldn't max the game out or run it in 1440p and their 3.5GB VRAM 970 was completely ♥♥♥♥♥♥(Still is for quite a few people). The game itself you could actually run for the most part and, like Dishonored 2, a few people could run it without problems. However, there was serious issues with driving in Arkham Knight regardless which was fixed. It was a ♥♥♥♥ port but it was definitely comparable to this ♥♥♥♥ port(Which also crashes on consoles and has frame drops).

AC Unity was buggy but still playable(PS4 simply couldn't handle it and averaged at 24FPS). It also had a lot going on and, an almost three year old game, looked ten times better than Dishonored 2 does.

Dishonored 2 has some of the most unheard of issues ranging from weird mouse glitches which make people physically sick to odd refresh rate problems to the point people are getting headaches from playing for thirty minutes or more. Then there's the blatant performance issues: Hanging for hours on the loading screen, frequent dips to single digit FPS, terrible performance ON ALL RANGES OF HARDWARE(1080's can't run the damn thing for crying out loud!), stuttering, micro stutter, textures failing to load, the game crashes.

What could have gone wrong went wrong with this game. Things that no one could have possibly thought that could have gone wrong went wrong.

So how about you get back in your box and suck on a grape. We're all thrilled the game works fine for you but, reality check, A ♥♥♥♥ LOAD OF US CAN'T RUN THE GAME OR PLAY IT BECAUSE IT RUNS LIKE ♥♥♥♥!

Dish 2 problems are not unheard - SEE RAGE AND WOLFENSTEIN - both use ID TECH 5 - both had/have horrible FPS issues and thats a fact !

[Spyx]

Batman was 10 times better working then dishonored 2. Sure it wasn't perfect but i had fun with it. But dishonored 2...... ufff . Sound is sometimes there sometimes not. Mouse feels strange and laggy. Fps Drops from 40-50 to 15.

[Aahzmandias]

It seems to be the same level of bad, no matter what you are trying to tell us. The ONLY thing that is different now is, that the average gaming PC is better now, so the fps drops seem to be not SO bad in general.

The devs have to prroof now, that it is not their game engine. Making a working patch in a short time.

And not giving up after months, like they had to in Batman Arkham Knights.

Only time can tell if what you are saying is the truth, or I am telling the truth. But don't asume things, you are not able to proof.

All I can say is, don't buy it, untill they are able to fix it. Let them proof first, that this game is not as bad as "Batman Arkham Knights" was.

[Kitanii]

ramyland_maelstrom님이 먼저 게시:

Dr.Larry님이 먼저 게시:

It's worse than those listed games.

NMS shouldn't even come into the equation given the issues with that game were the blatant lies and promises the developers made prior to release. The game actually ran and did, loosely, what it said on the tin. It was a ♥♥♥♥ game that never should have been priced at €60 or even €30.

Arkham Knight had a lot of issues BUT those were mainly tied to VRAM issues so people's ♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6GB of VRAM on a 980Ti couldn't max the game out or run it in 1440p and their 3.5GB VRAM 970 was completely ♥♥♥♥♥♥(Still is for quite a few people). The game itself you could actually run for the most part and, like Dishonored 2, a few people could run it without problems. However, there was serious issues with driving in Arkham Knight regardless which was fixed. It was a ♥♥♥♥ port but it was definitely comparable to this ♥♥♥♥ port(Which also crashes on consoles and has frame drops).

AC Unity was buggy but still playable(PS4 simply couldn't handle it and averaged at 24FPS). It also had a lot going on and, an almost three year old game, looked ten times better than Dishonored 2 does.

Dishonored 2 has some of the most unheard of issues ranging from weird mouse glitches which make people physically sick to odd refresh rate problems to the point people are getting headaches from playing for thirty minutes or more. Then there's the blatant performance issues: Hanging for hours on the loading screen, frequent dips to single digit FPS, terrible performance ON ALL RANGES OF HARDWARE(1080's can't run the damn thing for crying out loud!), stuttering, micro stutter, textures failing to load, the game crashes.

What could have gone wrong went wrong with this game. Things that no one could have possibly thought that could have gone wrong went wrong.

So how about you get back in your box and suck on a grape. We're all thrilled the game works fine for you but, reality check, A ♥♥♥♥ LOAD OF US CAN'T RUN THE GAME OR PLAY IT BECAUSE IT RUNS LIKE ♥♥♥♥!

Dish 2 problems are not unheard - SEE RAGE AND WOLFENSTEIN - both use ID TECH 5 - both had/have horrible FPS issues and thats a fact !

This is apparently based on idTech6 though. It's rewritten to 70% so it''s not really idTech anymore, but the Void Engine. Considering how amazing idTech 6 is and what techniques it supports this was a slap in the face even though I really like their lighting engine used here.

[ramyland_maelstrom]

its ID TECH 5 not 6 - both rage and wolf have the same problems as dishonored 2 !

[Selfish Lee Everett]

Dr.Larry님이 먼저 게시:

Arkham Knight had a lot of issues BUT those were mainly tied to VRAM issues so people's ♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6GB of VRAM on a 980Ti couldn't max the game out or run it in 1440p and their 3.5GB VRAM 970 was completely ♥♥♥♥♥♥(Still is for quite a few people).

Thank u for the history lesson. Will never forget the moment the 970 users realized they were screwed. so many tears..