Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If it's a lethal one, depends if I am doing assault or assassination, but in either case I will still protect and save civilians whenever possible (even if that requires incapacitating them during the brawl, before or after).
Four people died and you didn't have pull the trigger ot dirty your blade. That's like winning the lotto.
I can think of only one instance across all games where non-lethal is the obvious 'good' option. Daud and Billie are somewhat debatable, but in every other instance lethal is clearly better.
As long as you kill <20% of the population each mission you should still get the good ending, but it can get tiresome how it always portrays non-lethal as better.
How? What penalty is there for High Chaos? You get the "bad" ending? You get the ending that matches how you played the character - if you suddenly became a kind, just and prosperous ruler after killing half the population of your Empire's second city it wouldn't make any sense.