Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I guy did a direct unit comparison vid a while back. Check it out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqybHixruHg
Didn't say you should. You're missing the point.
Pikes will do better in that role. It's really not even a contest.
Pikes will do everything that swordsman can do better *and* cheaper. They are better at melee. They are better at withstanding arrows. Their speeds aren't significantly different.
There is really only one small niche swordsman fill - they're useful for tanking arrows if your map is very wood poor.
If you know of some other niche where swords are actually better than pikes, I'm all ears.
Anyway play whichever way you like against the AI...
you can conquer at least 5 provinces in italy;) in like 5 or 6 turns and win in 14 alike