Steel Ocean

Steel Ocean

View Stats:
Can my ATI Radeon HD 5400 Series Graphics card run this game?
Please help, I dont want to have low fps as in WoWS.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 15 comments
f.meussen Nov 15, 2015 @ 6:14am 
NO it cant, this game is far worser optimized as WoWs. I get 15fps with a GTX980 TI card.
This game is very badly optimised.
Last edited by f.meussen; Nov 15, 2015 @ 6:15am
[EIC]RedTiger Nov 15, 2015 @ 6:17am 
oh :(
JamesBondStyle Nov 15, 2015 @ 6:47am 
Try running it, it doesnt hurt trying. The game even has a minimum quality (below low) so that a wide variety of people can run this game.
Last edited by JamesBondStyle; Nov 15, 2015 @ 6:47am
oh,maybe you can't,you need a better graphics card
marcelsantoro Nov 15, 2015 @ 6:55am 
... my 970 60 fps `-`
Blondi Nov 15, 2015 @ 9:41am 
yeah this game isnt exactly ati optimized, sadly, perhaps in a few weeks or motnhs, who knows :3 if this game gets popular, and gets more servers + optimizations. it could be great, but i still have fun witth it... but i do have to say, i have a hd6990/i5-2500k+enough memory. and running from a SSD :D i still am running the game on medium/terrain low and still get from 60 fps drops to 30 ish :D

but its doable, and the gameplay is great.
Armisael Nov 19, 2015 @ 9:37pm 
Originally posted by f.meussen:
NO it cant, this game is far worser optimized as WoWs. I get 15fps with a GTX980 TI card.
This game is very badly optimised.
Seriously, I have 30 fps in this game, and in WoWS i can only obtain 12 fps.
Blondi Nov 20, 2015 @ 5:35am 
Originally posted by armisael:
Originally posted by f.meussen:
NO it cant, this game is far worser optimized as WoWs. I get 15fps with a GTX980 TI card.
This game is very badly optimised.
Seriously, I have 30 fps in this game, and in WoWS i can only obtain 12 fps.
yes but i bet you have a nvidia card right ?

this game is just way better optimized for nvidia chipsets, and while ati has the raw power, meaning overall oyu owuld get betetr performance, only not at the games where they optimized it to run better on nvidia....

i guess its a case of ... follow the money and ALOT of lobbying from nvidias side. :D
Face Nov 20, 2015 @ 8:15am 
2x 290x amd msi's here and i get 60fps solid on the highest settings....
Blondi Nov 20, 2015 @ 8:19am 
Originally posted by Face of Insanity:
2x 290x amd msi's here and i get 60fps solid on the highest settings....
i have a hd6990, but i can only run it on mid/terrain low, and then i still have 20 fps drops to 40 at start of the game, perhaps its cpu, but i5-2500k with 8gb ram and running from ssd,so i dunno :D
Last edited by Blondi; Nov 20, 2015 @ 8:19am
Armisael Nov 20, 2015 @ 10:13am 
Originally posted by Blondi:
Originally posted by armisael:
Seriously, I have 30 fps in this game, and in WoWS i can only obtain 12 fps.
yes but i bet you have a nvidia card right ?

this game is just way better optimized for nvidia chipsets, and while ati has the raw power, meaning overall oyu owuld get betetr performance, only not at the games where they optimized it to run better on nvidia....

i guess its a case of ... follow the money and ALOT of lobbying from nvidias side. :D



Originally posted by Blondi:
Originally posted by armisael:
Seriously, I have 30 fps in this game, and in WoWS i can only obtain 12 fps.
yes but i bet you have a nvidia card right ?

this game is just way better optimized for nvidia chipsets, and while ati has the raw power, meaning overall oyu owuld get betetr performance, only not at the games where they optimized it to run better on nvidia....

i guess its a case of ... follow the money and ALOT of lobbying from nvidias side. :D

I have an AMD 760G chipset with integrated Radeon HD 3000, my dedicated gpu broken entirely few months ago, use various graphics cards (gtx 750,880, - Radeon HD 5450,5870,6850) but WoWS never rose above 18fps.
Blondi Nov 20, 2015 @ 10:26am 
Originally posted by armisael:
Originally posted by Blondi:
yes but i bet you have a nvidia card right ?

this game is just way better optimized for nvidia chipsets, and while ati has the raw power, meaning overall oyu owuld get betetr performance, only not at the games where they optimized it to run better on nvidia....

i guess its a case of ... follow the money and ALOT of lobbying from nvidias side. :D



Originally posted by Blondi:
yes but i bet you have a nvidia card right ?

this game is just way better optimized for nvidia chipsets, and while ati has the raw power, meaning overall oyu owuld get betetr performance, only not at the games where they optimized it to run better on nvidia....

i guess its a case of ... follow the money and ALOT of lobbying from nvidias side. :D

I have an AMD 760G chipset with integrated Radeon HD 3000, my dedicated gpu broken entirely few months ago, use various graphics cards (gtx 750,880, - Radeon HD 5450,5870,6850) but WoWS never rose above 18fps.
hmmm, this is interesting to know. can i perhaps know what the rest of your system is ? like cpu/how much memory/operating system ?

with tryign so much different gfxcards, and yeah, sure all max perhaps owuldnt be possible, but not even noticing ANY difference ?
Armisael Nov 20, 2015 @ 12:12pm 
hmmm, this is interesting to know. can i perhaps know what the rest of your system is ? like cpu/how much memory/operating system ?

with tryign so much different gfxcards, and yeah, sure all max perhaps owuldnt be possible, but not even noticing ANY difference ?
these are my specs
Cpu: AMD FX-6300 Black Edition
Ram: 4GB 1300mhz DDR3
OS: win7 x64 (actually) win8 & win10 x64 (Previously)
Motherboard: m5a78l-m lx plus
Blondi Nov 20, 2015 @ 12:43pm 
Originally posted by armisael:
hmmm, this is interesting to know. can i perhaps know what the rest of your system is ? like cpu/how much memory/operating system ?

with tryign so much different gfxcards, and yeah, sure all max perhaps owuldnt be possible, but not even noticing ANY difference ?
these are my specs
Cpu: AMD FX-6300 Black Edition
Ram: 4GB 1300mhz DDR3
OS: win7 x64 (actually) win8 & win10 x64 (Previously)
Motherboard: m5a78l-m lx plus
i dont think this game will exceeed the 3.2gb memory mark, since its usable on xp too if i remember correctly, so its can be memory... weird :D

perhaps thisg ame is just badly optimized, whiel i have heard from some peopel that they can run it all on high with moderate systems like us.
Linerax Nov 20, 2015 @ 1:13pm 
Originally posted by JamesBondStyle:
Try running it, it doesnt hurt trying. The game even has a minimum quality (below low) so that a wide variety of people can run this game.
Hurts the person's eyes seeing framerates drop like bombs during air raids. :3
Last edited by Linerax; Nov 20, 2015 @ 1:13pm
< >
Showing 1-15 of 15 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Nov 15, 2015 @ 5:47am
Posts: 15