安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Nah that explanation is bunk. A CH is when you hit someone during their attack start up frames. A punish is when you hit someone during recovery frames.
No way the game would have considered that a punish.
It's either lag or the second hit isn't actually guaranteed. IDK enough about Anna to say which.
I know what a CH or a punish is, the claim was literally that it was too late and the d3 actually hit the recovery, THEREFORE it wasn't a CH.
How is an isolated case of a timing related anomaly more likely in a lockstep based netcode than an attack simply being further along in it's course than one would think at first glance?
Care to actually explain why he's wrong, or are you just gonna stick with "I'm right, and whoever disagrees with me is clearly wrong!"?
Or you know, Dragunov's attack could have whiffed due to Anna's d3 animation. Not like this is a game where crazy punch-through-the-gut scenarios happen where the attack ends up whiffing due to wonky hitglobes.
Deep words from a throwaway account.
You had to make this profile cause your other one was banned due to all the death threats and wishing my family gets raped?