Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No because 1ms is not input lag, it is the response time - the amount of time a pixel in a display takes to change. This is related to motion blur. The manufactures don't advertise input lag, you have to research reviews.
Use https://displaylag.com/ to see what monitors have good display lag.
i think i really need a decent monitor with a 1ms 144hz atleast 1080p so i can have a peace of mind when playing tekken and fps game like call of duty, while my 4k tv is for casual games like shadow of war and other triple A titles ..
For example: on a perfect monitor, you might have 0ms input lag on the upper part of the image, but 17ms input lag on the lower part*. Here's a video, so you can better understand what I mean: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLg6ocpAn7M
*Sidenote: this is also the reason for tearing. If a new image is beeing sent out to your monitor, while your monitor was busy with building up the previous frame, the lower part will not match the upper part, creating the "tearing" effect. This can be solved by holding back rendered frames using Vsync (which increases input lag) or better methods like FreeSync and Gsync. Or by using a high-refresh monitors on low-FPS games (but more on this later).
Thus even the best 60Hz monitors, delivering the lowest input lag, will have some sort of "input lag" on the lower portion of the image, causing image tearing. What do you do to eliminate tearing? You activate Vsync, so your input delay goes up again. My ASUS VG245HE, which is rated as one of the best 60Hz/75Hz monitors out there (10ms input lag at 60Hz), has about 1 frame of delay with FreeSync activated.
Why are 144Hz monitors better, even for 60Hz content? Because a 144Hz monitor builds up a single frame in about 7ms. Which means, there is no more than 7ms difference between the upper and the lower part of the image. Plus, 144Hz are made only for gaming, thus manufacturers focusing on input delay. The ASUS MG248QR for example has an input lag of only 4ms. Paired with 1ms GTG and 144Hz, this is a whole different level compared to the ASUS VG245HE. Other than that, 144Hz is quite affordable these days.
Now about tearing: whenever a new frame arrives, while your monitor was working on the previous frame, the image will cause a tearing effect (Google up FreeSync). This is more likely to happen, when you have a 60Hz monitor and are running a 60FPS game, than on a 144Hz monitor and running a 60FPS game.
60FPS means, every 16.67ms a new image is generated and 144Hz means, your monitor just needs 7ms to show a complete image. Whenever a new image arrives within that 7ms time frame, you will notice tear. It's not like it will never happen. But it will happen so rarely, that you won't bother / notice. On the other hand, playing 144FPS games on 144Hz without Vsync will produce alot of tear. However, activating Vsync at 144FPS only introduces a maximum of 7ms input delay, which can be ignored in most cases. I'm considering this as the "poor man's Gsync", if you have an Nvidia graphics card and don't want to pay a premium for Gsync.
So yeah, there you have it. 144Hz worth it? Depends on whether you think 1 frame is worth it. For me (competitive scene, streamer), it was. So I got myself an Alienware AW2518HF (240Hz, 5ms Input Lag) for about 300€.
Good luck.
*** get a freesync monitor if you have AMD.
I agree on the fact though, that Gsync / FreeSync will yield the *best* experience. Nevertheless, Gsync is also the most expensive option with your recommended monitor selling for about 760€. Good Gsync monitors at 1080p are around 450€. You can have almost unnoticable difference in Tekken 7 at around 280€ by going for the ViewSonic XG2402 on an Nvidia setup, or 220€ for the HP Omen 25.
https://i.imgur.com/FlDkhBD.png
Just because YOU cant tell the difference, doesnt mean it isnt there. Some people have better eyesight than others. And/or they are more sensitive to things like lag and jitter. You can go wrong with 144hz without Gsync or freesync if u play a 60FPS game.
Also speak for yourself, maybe in Europe technology is expensive but not ehre in america. You can get Gsync monitors for $350 at the cheapest!
There are people who test for these things and are dedicated. Check out the blurbusters fourm. You can learn a lot from them
Theres only 2 ways to experience 100% smoothness from a 60FPS locked game. Gsnyc/Freesync or Vsync On (even that sometimes doesnt work due to the flucation of 59, 59.94 and 60FPS) different framerates and frametimes flucating and changing due to the engine but are all considered "60FPS"
I'm stopping here, as discussion doesn't make sense at this point, without even knowing which graphics card the thread author is using. We just know he's gaming on a 4K TV (Vsync on / off?) and he looks for something better (which shouldn't be too difficult).
//Edit:
Vsync on alone won't yield you a smooth game. It will prevent tearing at the cost of input lag, but 60FPS Vsync on will still jitter on e.g. 75Hz.