Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeap, pretty much. I'm not trying to toot my horn but Lee forces you to actually learn the games basic mechanics because in my opinion Lee dosen't have a flow chart playstyle. He also dosen't have many abusable moves (except for fff 3+4) so as a Lee main I'm forced to evolve my playstyle to the opponents.
Lee is my main and believe it or not my side characters have a higher ranks then him lol, because he is not easy to consistenly win with (mainly due to b+2 mist step cancels).
His fastest launcher is I17 with short range. He has the worst launchers and lows in the game. But makes up for it in other departments.
Lee has more tools in many scenarios. But with mist cancels (especially into ISW,) Just frames and tight execution for often mediocre results. The risk reward can be quite skewed.
It could be since he's an advanced character and people put a lot of work in.
I find I either roll him hard and he doesn't have the precision unless it's a higher level player. Great example, I had some great ranked wars against a Lee player - I won the first 2, he won the next 3. I was Jin though (balanced but lacks some unpredictability compared to some of the cast).