Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
My thoughts: Scott is the creator of Five Night's at Freddy's, so since he created this game. He technically, IS Purple Man metaphorically as The Purple Man was the one who killed the children and the boy who the guy in the video said was GF after The Purple Guy killed him, thus creating the horrors of Freddy Fazbear's Pizza.
Since Scott is The Purple Man metaphorically, and if you count FNaF 3 as being THE LAST GAME of the series, The Purple Man kills all 4 animatronics, metaphorically killing the horrors off finally and thus making all Freddy Fazbear's Pizza animatronics normal again and freeing the trapped children in the suits. (The phantom's still need their sole to be freed though)
Purple Man dying at the end is probably metaphoric for something since the children won't be murdered and stuffed into the suits by The Purple Man anymore so Scott can't make any more games to continue the series.
However though... each time someone makes a game or a fangame, Canon or Noncanon, THEY themselves, are taking on the role of Purple Guy or someone like him. While the player is taking the role as the nightguard of course.
What do you guys think of this as a metaphor?