Theory: the bite of 83/87 revealed!

[[Creative name here]]

Now, the leading debate right now is wether this is the infamous bite of 87, or a new bite of 83. my answer to this might shock you: its both. well, technically speaking. now, the game has confused many people, as it seems to take place at fredbear's, yet the first-game animatronics AND the toys appear in the minigames. this makes no sense, as fredbears should have closed down before fazbear existed. well, we were right. this game was meant to trick us, to make us think fazbear existed at the same time as fredbear. exept all along it didnt. here is the truth about the bite of 87:
it WAS 1983 when the little kid was thrown into the mouth of fredbear. but 83 wasnt the time that woul be reconized, as it was when the kid met his fate: 1987. this kid was in a coma for 4 years. whether you play as the kid or his brother in the main part of the game is unknown, but it could be both, as the brother had nightmares of guilt, finally understanding how his brother saw the animatronics. at first he boycotted fredbears and fazbears as it opened. but the nightmares continued. then he had a different idea. he decided to work at fazbears, to see the animatronics as their nice, child-entertaining stage, in hopes to stop the nightmares. he soon became the phone guy. but here is the thing: he told his stories to his brother in the coma, and his brother heard him. the fnaf 4 minigames represent the kid in his coma, reliving his demise over and over again. except his brain has added features from his big brother's tales from freddy fazbear's pizzaria. until 1987, when his brother made his final apology (night 6) , and pulled the cord, not willing to see his little bro suffer so much anymore.


some questions you may have:
1)What did the bite of 87 have to do with the animatronics not moving during the day anymore?
well, once they proved to be dangerous, they probably wanted the animatronics to interact with the kids at a minimum. once the replacement suits came in (fnaf 2 withered animatronics), they appeared to have been made almost identical to the springlock suits. so it was better to not let those move around either. this is why phone guy sounds so suprised in fnaf 2 with the day moving animatronics. since the toys were clearly made much differently than the originals, it was possible they fixed some safety issues. once those malfunctioned, they once again upped the safety and locked them on stage.

2)why was the bite not mentioned in fnaf 2?
since it took place in fredbears, its possible fazbear's wasnt affected that much, so there was no reason to mention it, as the drawback, no day moving animatronics, was pulled back with the toys. plus the child didnt die yet, so the event didnt seem as bad..

3) what is night 6 and 7?
who knows? perhaps it isnt canon, perhaps it is the child's hell, perhaps its the brothers nightmares continuing.

i will add any questions in the comments, just dont overdo me please.

[[Creative name here]]

so i am guessing no one cares. no wonder scott is keeping that damn box closed...

[XJ-126 (Mate) ○°]

Originally posted by DerpzGamer:

so i am guessing no one cares. no wonder scott is keeping that damn box closed...

It is morning right now. Not everyone is awake yet.

[TheAuditor24]

The Nightmare animatronics aren't the first game animatronics, it's the bullies in the coma child's mind, since they disguised as the animatronics in one of the minigames (the one where Fredbear bites the coma child's head).

[ColdCoffee]

It's been confirmed that you play a bit after the Bite of 1987.
Plus, why wouldn't they acknowledge such an accident until four years after the child had been bitten, and died from his injuries?

The protagonist is a small child, Derpz. Not a teenager or an adult. Such a crushing blow to the head would be resulting in near fatal injuries, given that it wasn't just the frontal lobe at took the brunt of the Bite.

There was no Bite of '83, as the commercial merely shows the date on which F&F was established. In addition, Freddy Fazbear's was linked to Fredbear & Friends in a way, seeing as the commercials show both Freddy and Fredbear being completely separate from each other.

Also, the Nightmares are the, you guessed it, Nightmare versions of the second game's Withered set of the band, only much more damaged while being based on a relatively intact version from the past.

You got Fazbear being relatively unaffected by the Bite, aside from restricted mobility for the animatronics, right, but the reason why the animatronics cannot move during the day is because of the fact that the older models were likely part of F&F when it was still open, and the Toy animatronics were probably in development, and shared the same level of technology, since a figure of Toy Bonnie appears as part of a child's set of toys, with Mangle showing up in the protagonist's home in what can be assumed to be a girl's/woman's bedroom.

[[Creative name here]]

Originally posted by Sync:

It's been confirmed that you play a bit after the Bite of 1987.
Plus, why wouldn't they acknowledge such an accident until four years after the child had been bitten, and died from his injuries?

The protagonist is a small child, Derpz. Not a teenager or an adult. Such a crushing blow to the head would be resulting in near fatal injuries, given that it wasn't just the frontal lobe at took the brunt of the Bite.

There was no Bite of '83, as the commercial merely shows the date on which F&F was established. In addition, Freddy Fazbear's was linked to Fredbear & Friends in a way, seeing as the commercials show both Freddy and Fredbear being completely separate from each other.

Also, the Nightmares are the, you guessed it, Nightmare versions of the second game's Withered set of the band, only much more damaged while being based on a relatively intact version from the past.

You got Fazbear being relatively unaffected by the Bite, aside from restricted mobility for the animatronics, right, but the reason why the animatronics cannot move during the day is because of the fact that the older models were likely part of F&F when it was still open, and the Toy animatronics were probably in development, and shared the same level of technology, since a figure of Toy Bonnie appears as part of a child's set of toys, with Mangle showing up in the protagonist's home in what can be assumed to be a girl's/woman's bedroom.

Well, i tried :/

[[Creative name here]]

the funny thing is how theorys like this will get so much hate once matpat's comes out.