Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes, other locations existed, the ones you're making up -- however -- did not. The rest of locations aren't mentioned in the saga because nothing of relevance happened there. We're only told of events happening at Freddy Fazbear's Pizza and Fredbear's Family Diner because they were key to the development of the story. If there were Freddy Fazbear's Steak House or Fredbear's Hooter's, it is of no relevance to the story. That's why we can rule out the possibility that Fredbear & Friends is a restaurant at all. Scott went out of his way to mention Fredbear's Family Diner because events of importance happened there, but we're never told of any other location therefore you can't just make them appear from nowhere just because your theory is flawed.
Random hypothesis in random threads have nothing to do with my theory though. In my theory (which I'm going to post in an hour or so) you won't find a single loan. If people propose ideas, I contribute with other ideas, but it doesn't mean it's a part of my concept theory. I'm glad my own random ideas can inspire new thoughts in yours but honestly, that's not included in my theory.
The first guy finished his week but complained about "conditions" -- Week #1 Purple Man
You're only the second guard to work in that location -- Week #2 Jeremy as nightguard
We don't have a replacement for your shift yet but we're working on it - Extra shift (Fritz)
In fact, we might just be short of a day in those two weeks since Jeremy works 6 days as night guard, not 7. Before Jeremy takes the last day shift, the newspaper already claims the pizzeria is closing after being open for a few short weeks and the animatronics are being scrapped for possible malfunctions. Not the kind of press you'd want if you're going to remain open for two more weeks. Even Phone guy is telling Jeremy they have one more event the following day and how he'll take the night shift in the future.
FNAF 2 was only open for 2 weeks, and out of those two weeks they spent two days closed to the public due to the investigation, there's no way around that.
If they left their original building after the first crimes to get a new and better one to leave their bad reputation behind, why would they EVER BUY a location with an already pre-existing bad reputation? Error 404 - Logic not found!
They had to return to the original pizzeria where the crimes were committed after FNAF 2 because they owned the place and had no money for anything else. So why would they BUY another location, smaller than the one in FNAF 2, with a pre-existing bad reputation? Makes no sense. They had building A in the original pizzeria, after the crimes they moved to building B to start anew (FNAF 2), but after even more crimes, they had no money and were forced to return to their old buildng A (FNAF 1) because they couldn't afford anything else.
Fredbear's Family Diner, building C, doesn't fit in that equation, the sooner you accept it, the better your theorizing will be.
"Hey, good job, night 5! Um, hey, um, keep a close eye on things tonight, ok? Um, from what I understand, the building is on lockdown, uh, no one is allowed in or out, y'know, especially concerning any...previous employees. Um, when we get it all sorted out, we may move you to the day shift, a position just became...available. Uh, we don't have a replacement for your shift yet, but we're working on it. Uh, we're going to try to contact the original restaurant owner. Uh, I think the name of the place was..."Fredbear's Family Diner" or something like that. It's been closed for years though, I doubt we'll be able to track anybody down."
Ok, read it all now and tell me if it's out of place. Cause the only thing out of place would be telling Jeremy they don't have a replacement for him yet, the rest of the conversation is focused in the same topic: the investigation, the day shift guy being the prime suspect and their quest to find info about him from the old location at which he used to work.
Telling Jeremy about a new restaurant they plan on opening with the owners of the restaurant where employees were maimed and children crunched would be out of place for real. The only thing we hear about a new location is that Phone guy would take the night shift and that the CEO in the newspaper hopes to reopen SOMEDAY = no plans to reopen anytime soon with Fredbear's.
All this thing you've made up about Purple man putting the blame on someone else and yada yada couldn't be more incorrect. But if you want to believe that, even though the game clearly tells us Purple man fled ONLY after the investigation pointed towards him being the culprit and that the building was on lockdown precisely to catch him if he returned... well, to each their own.
*facepalms at the saferoom comment* I don't even want to go that route again. Believe what you want.
Didn't you just say they bought the place but scrapped everything else? And wrong, it's precisely in 1987 when the springlock suits no longer exist, the only remaining one is Golden Freddy and he's just "a spare in the back". The springlock suits were used in the original pizzeria and diner (the real sister locations mentioned in the training cassettes, you know), after their safety issues they were decommissioned, reason why Golden Freddy is not in use in FNAF 2 and why this location you guys keep inventing where the springlock suits are created or brought back to life, is not real. It doesn't fit AT ALL with the FNAF 3 training cassettes, make up as much of the story as you want but that won't do.
Also, if this happened at a totally different location with a STATIC springlock suit, why do the withered-then-fixed-non-springlock-based animatronics in a DIFFERENT/SISTER LOCATION pizzeria (FNAF 1) get stripped of their ability to roam around? How does that make any sense? Accept it, the bite was caused by an animatronic who was roaming through the restaurant, there's no reason to keep them in place if the bite happened with a static animatronic not moving from the stage!
So I'm just going with the conclusion that FNaF 1 is in 1993 since I don't think Scott would want to make it that complicated. Thanks for checking out this old post!
♥♥♥♥ OFF OK. HE DONE HARD WORK LOOK I THOUGHT IT WAS 1993 COS THE WAY OF THE CHECK LOOK CANT YOU LOT BE GLAD SOME ONE DONE HARD WORK AND GONE oh wow thanks man thanks for doing the hard work cos a brain like me cant find that out and hell at least this man thors are right not like mat pat oh i thought phone guy is puple man oh and mike was the bite so look thank sir for doing the work for me now my theros are ez
so then if it was 31 years after fnaf 1 and it was 1992 since then..
then you're correct.
BUT..
if it was 30 years then it would be 1993 in fnaf 1
*ace attorney desk slam*
Then you would be wrong.
but we'll see.