Five Nights at Freddy's 4

Five Nights at Freddy's 4

Debunking the Dream Theory
Well, yet another post featuring this famous theory, but this time I think I successfully debunked it, and I´ll explain you guys what´s my thoughts (Forgive me for my poor english lol)

I´ll try to make this short so here we go: The problem I found with this theory is that for it to be true, the victim of the bite (the child of FNAF 4) has to be dreaming (or in this case having a NIGHTMARE, of course), but if that´s true, then we can´t consider him as the bite of ´87 victim, because the victim LOST HIS FRONTAL LOBE, and with it the ability to have fears. As MatPat once stated on one of his theories about the game, there is NO WAY someone who lost the frontal lobe to be afraid of anything, let alone have Nightmares, but the person CAN have GOOD dreams, not bad ones.

With that bein said, I say that it is impossible for the dream theory to be true, UNLESS that this kid we control is NOT the bite of ´87 victim.

Before people try to kill me because I said that the kid may not be the victim, I do think he is, that´s why I believe that the dream theory can´t be true, just because of this single fact that I think we ALL had overlooked.

thanks for all who took some time to read this, and please share with me your thoughts.

God Bless you all!
< >
16-27 van 27 reacties weergegeven
'Kay, want to debunk the bullsh- I mean...the dream theory quite fast?

Let's see, the dream theory realies on being stupidly nitpicky on certain details, while purposely ignoring others.
Let's be nitpicky outselves: While dreaming you can't read, and FNaF 1-3 have several texts here and there.

There you have it.
Origineel geplaatst door Hunter #357:

What I am understanding from all this is...

You think that FNaF is all a dream. Nothing of it actually happened, it was all just the imagination of a child.

I do not believe the dream theory at all. I'm just giving my two cents on why, IF the dream theory was true, the neverending battle to figure out who the victim of the bite of '87 was is pointless as it was made up by the child in his dreams/coma and thus it didn't actually happen to anyone :)

(This thread is titled debunking the dream theory after all xD I'm contributing to debunking it)
Origineel geplaatst door alber_fgg:
Let's be nitpicky outselves: While dreaming you can't read, and FNaF 1-3 have several texts here and there.

There you have it.
I believe Doctor Script already went over that point...
Laatst bewerkt door RippoMadness; 17 mrt 2016 om 15:59
I think we're on to something with the Dream Theory. We're on the right track! We're just missing one giant detail. One detail that makes every sense. One detail sitting right in front of our faces. I know it.

Or probably not and I'm just making a big fool of myself.
Origineel geplaatst door Fugitoid:
I think we're on to something with the Dream Theory. We're on the right track! We're just missing one giant detail. One detail that makes every sense. One detail sitting right in front of our faces. I know it.

Or probably not and I'm just making a big fool of myself.
For a second, I thought you were going to bring up the whole "grandfather clock" thing. To which my response would've been the Picard facepalm clip. Thank goodness you didn't go down that route...
Origineel geplaatst door RippoMadness:
Origineel geplaatst door Fugitoid:
I think we're on to something with the Dream Theory. We're on the right track! We're just missing one giant detail. One detail that makes every sense. One detail sitting right in front of our faces. I know it.

Or probably not and I'm just making a big fool of myself.
For a second, I thought you were going to bring up the whole "grandfather clock" thing. To which my response would've been the Picard facepalm clip. Thank goodness you didn't go down that route...
Yeah, the grandfather clock thing was pretty ridiculous in my opinion, too.
Origineel geplaatst door Fugitoid:
Origineel geplaatst door RippoMadness:
For a second, I thought you were going to bring up the whole "grandfather clock" thing. To which my response would've been the Picard facepalm clip. Thank goodness you didn't go down that route...
Yeah, the grandfather clock thing was pretty ridiculous in my opinion, too.
The only actual original point that MatPat makes in his 'Dream Theory' video and it's so unbelievably desperate... oh, how the mighty have fallen...
Laatst bewerkt door RippoMadness; 17 mrt 2016 om 16:38
I'm sorry to say admittedly I haven't the time to read all of this, but I was curious why no one brings up the possibility(at least not in a very long time as I've seen) of the C.C. mini-games being the dream/nightmare, and the game play as reality. It's irrelevant that the animatronics can't be in his home/ look like that/ the mechanics of the ani's. If say, you're insane, or a child with vivid imagination, or possibly a victim of some physical trauma. Even a child bullied could eventually, with enough sleep deprivation due to irrational fear; would conjure up this scenario. (Having been in a similar situation myself)

With the very blatant story telling style Scott created, Night=us, and "Day"= children/ani's; wouldn't it be a little obvious to say perhaps (in using the constant of `mini-games aren't reality b/c they aren't literal + FNaF3's just bizarre one's. **The playing of said mini-games by us via obscure unlocking methods can be explained by the phone guy's remark on the ventilation system.) dream theory is wrong in regards to the first 3 games being a dream. With the mini-games showing a increasing loss of sanity(as his dreams), all starting in FNaF 4 as the child we play....
Origineel geplaatst door RippoMadness:
Origineel geplaatst door Fugitoid:
Yeah, the grandfather clock thing was pretty ridiculous in my opinion, too.
The only actual original point that MatPat makes in his 'Dream Theory' video and it can it's so unbelievably desperate... oh, how the mighty have fallen...
He's always been too out-there.....and obnoxious.
Origineel geplaatst door Fugitoid:
Origineel geplaatst door RippoMadness:
The only actual original point that MatPat makes in his 'Dream Theory' video and it can it's so unbelievably desperate... oh, how the mighty have fallen...
He's always been too out-there.....and obnoxious.
My biggest gripe with that video is that is was just plain boring. It essentially just regurgitated the Dream Theory at its most basic form. Almost as if MatPat was just throwing his hands up in the air and giving up saying, "It's all a dream! It's the only thing that makes any sense." Weeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaakkk!!!
Origineel geplaatst door RippoMadness:
Origineel geplaatst door Fugitoid:
He's always been too out-there.....and obnoxious.
My biggest gripe with that video is that is was just plain boring. It essentially just regurgitated the Dream Theory at its most basic form. Almost as if MatPat was just throwing his hands up in the air and giving up saying, "It's all a dream! It's the only thing that makes any sense." Weeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaakkk!!!

My biggest gripe is that he has two, TWO, channels dedicated to pointing out that reality and fiction don't line up with each other... Then turns around and uses serial killer profiling, corporate structure and brain functions to make points. If there was ever a human being that should be wary of the limitations of real life phenomenon as evidence for fiction, it should be MatPat.

*Sigh*
XD *sigh* indeed :/
< >
16-27 van 27 reacties weergegeven
Per pagina: 1530 50

Geplaatst op: 17 mrt 2016 om 11:12
Aantal berichten: 27