The Bite of '87 is Jeremy.

[Mayhem]

The 'bite of '87' that everyone in FNAF fandom seems confused about...that is what happens to your character, Jeremy, at the end of FNAF 2. Your character is told they have a day shift at a birthday party and to stay close to the animatronics, which were in free roam mode (remember, they had it shut off after this incident according to the reference in FNAF 1) as directed by their supervisor/phone guy - he gets his frontal lobe bitten off for it. It has nothing to do with 1983 or the Golden Freddy stage animatronic, that stood in place.

[Phantom Echoes]

Proof?

This has been debunked a while ago, though, so yeah.

[wifeburger]

The Bite of 87' victim was the crying child.

[APaleDude]

I still think that the incident in FNAF 4 is the Bite of 87.

[wifeburger]

Originally posted by NiGhTmArIoNnE Ze Geek (G.E.M.):

I still think that the incident in FNAF 4 is the Bite of 87.

There's more evidence to the events of FNaF 4 was the bite of 87' that outweighs the 83' theory.
During the build up to FNaF 4, Scott posted alot of '87's' on his website, and in the game files alot of code can be related to '8' and '7.' The only argument people have against it is that the TV says "Fredbear & Friends. 1983" which I think is just the copyright date of the show, and not the current year that the game takes place in.

[Mayhem]

If you are playing the game's yourself, it's obvious that when you're told you're working the day shift, in '87, at a birthday party, and to stay close - that you will be the one bitten the next day. That's Scott's dark humor at play. It's also storytelling. Please read my first post. If you play the game's it's very clear. The 'free roam' was turned off in the day, because of this incident. The child in FNAF 4 was maimed by a stationary stage animatronic, which is not part of this particular story or incident. There are multiple factions at work in the FNAF story.

[AirFreshener]

No.

[Dani]

Originally posted by Marie:

Originally posted by NiGhTmArIoNnE Ze Geek (G.E.M.):

I still think that the incident in FNAF 4 is the Bite of 87.

There's more evidence to the events of FNaF 4 was the bite of 87' that outweighs the 83' theory.
During the build up to FNaF 4, Scott posted alot of '87's' on his website, and in the game files alot of code can be related to '8' and '7.' The only argument people have against it is that the TV says "Fredbear & Friends. 1983" which I think is just the copyright date of the show, and not the current year that the game takes place in.

And those 87s were purely coincidental, which has been a known fact for a long time.

[Mayhem]

I played these games, I didn't watch someone play them, yelling over it. You have to play them and read the story and feel what's going on for yourself. I didn't read 'Christian Today' and other sites 'take' on the story. I love horror stories, written or visual, and have been ingesting them for a long time - I tell them myself, and I greatly appreciate the one Scott is telling. This is my take - and I don't think it's invalid, and it's certainly more useful than a troll saying, "no".

As a fan of horror, not just this kind, there are certain themes at play. The story of this game is told in the first game, each one since has only given us more details to the relationships of the characters to one another. Golden Freddy, The Creations, The Children, The CEO, The Technician, The Supervisor, The Co-Founder/Family, The Scapegoat and New Blood - all in the first game. It's all so very vague however. That's the fun of talking about all of it and finding fellows who think on the same wavelengths, uncovering new pieces you may not have thought of yourself - we all have a different POV.

[Dani]

Originally posted by Mayhem:

I played these games, I didn't watch someone play them, yelling over it. You have to play them and read the story and feel what's going on for yourself. I didn't read 'Christian Today' and other sites 'take' on the story. I love horror stories, written or visual, and have been ingesting them for a long time - I tell them myself, and I greatly appreciate the one Scott is telling. This is my take - and I don't think it's invalid, and it's certainly more useful than a troll saying, "no".

As a fan of horror, not just this kind, there are certain themes at play. The story of this game is told in the first game, each one since has only given us more details to the relationships of the characters to one another. Golden Freddy, The Creations, The Children, The CEO, The Technician, The Supervisor, The Co-Founder/Family, The Scapegoat and New Blood - all in the first game. It's all so very vague however. That's the fun of talking about all of it and finding fellows who think on the same wavelengths, uncovering new pieces you may not have thought of yourself - we all have a different POV.

I've played the games.

[TheWolfman]

No! Not Jer Bear and next don't tell me the killer is Fritzy pie! 😩

[Mayhem]

Oh, I'm with you Kat.

[Rydi]

I wholeheartedly agree. In fact, even if people yell "Scott posted so many 87s for a reason", the truth is that if you take the actual details regarding the bite of '87, Mangle biting Jeremy in that last fateful day is the only possible option. But, you know, these guys just love saying Scott changed all the details of the bite for no reason even though it doesn't make any sense to the story. But tell them there's a chance Scott didn't portray the infamous bite in the final game and they lose their minds.

Before FNAF 4 was out, everyone believed Mangle had caused the bite of '87 and Jeremy was the victim. But Scott taunted them with the possibility that the bite could be shown and they clung to it like a toddler to a candy bar, disregarding the fact that the details of both bites don't add up by a long shot. But who cares about connecting the dots when you see a bite and you are desperate enough to consider that the bite of '87?

So, whatever floats these guys' boats. The bite mentioned in FNAF 1, with those exact details, happened in FNAF 2. Whatever we saw in FNAF 4 does not portray the bite of '87. Don't freaking twist the story to fit your agendas.

[Dani]

Originally posted by Mayhem:

Oh, I'm with you Kat.

I have done some research and found out there is a possibility that Phone Guy is the victim.
Right now, from what we can tell, either Jeremy or Phone Guy is the victim.

[TheWolfman]

JER BEAR WHY JER BEAR this screws up my whole fan fic. Yet again I added all security guards at the time of fnaf 2 so 😕

[Phantom Echoes]

Originally posted by eMSACHICK:

JER BEAR WHY JER BEAR this screws up my whole fan fic. Yet again I added all security guards at the time of fnaf 2 so 😕

Are you ok