Mangle, never actually had 2 heads

[GenericNameTxt]

So, with the new Sister Location coming out, fans have been blowing up with new theories. But, there is one mistake that I have seen so far, that I can pretty much confirm. With the new character "Funtime Foxy," many people think it is related with Mangle, and I get that, since the color pattern and the animal are the same. But some people think that Funtime Foxy could not be Mangle, as mangle had 2 heads. Not true. In FNAF 2, you see "2 heads." But Mangle is basically a take-apart toy, so what happened (at least I'm 99% sure,) is that the "second head" is actually part of Mangle's endoskeleton. Since Mangle is missing it's left eye, and the "second head" is missing it's right. That means that the "second head" is actually just a peice that has been detatched from Mangle



*If you're wondering why I'm posting this on FNAF 4, it's because that it's supposed to link to Sister Location, and FNAF 4 is the closest

[jupiter]

Please...

[jupiter]

Anyways, does this even matter?

[RippoMadness]

An interesting theory, but has been brought up before and has been debunked:

Completely ignoring the fact that Mangle has another eye sitting next to it in its starting position in FNAF 2, giving us the total of three eyes, not two, and that there's also the question of how Mangle is holding the eye in its mask properly if it has no endoskeleton in it, Mangle has an endoskeleton inside it's mask. If you closely inside of the mask (inside the jaws to be precise) you can see that the mask has endoskeleton teeth, proving that there's an endoskeleton in it. That second head is just an extra head apart of the monstrosity.

Besides, that doesn't really get rid of the fact that Mangle has three legs.

[Metbert]

I think that everyone know that when it was fixed it don't had 2 heads ... I mean is a children's restaurants ... not a an horror place so a character with 2 heads is inappropiate .

[Metbert]

Originally posted by RippoMadness:

An interesting theory, but has been brought up before and has been debunked:

Completely ignoring the fact that Mangle has another eye sitting next to it in its starting position in FNAF 2, giving us the total of three eyes, not two, and that there's also the question of how Mangle is holding the eye in its mask properly if it has no endoskeleton in it, Mangle has an endoskeleton inside it's mask. If you closely inside of the mask (inside the jaws to be precise) you can see that the mask has endoskeleton teeth, proving that there's an endoskeleton in it. That second head is just an extra head apart of the monstrosity.

Besides, that doesn't really get rid of the fact that Mangle has three legs.

sorry but only the adventure mangle and nightmare mangle have 3 legs . we don't saw Mangle stand up in fnaf2 so ... we can't be sure .

[GenericNameTxt]

Originally posted by RippoMadness:

An interesting theory, but has been brought up before and has been debunked:

Completely ignoring the fact that Mangle has another eye sitting next to it in its starting position in FNAF 2, giving us the total of three eyes, not two, and that there's also the question of how Mangle is holding the eye in its mask properly if it has no endoskeleton in it, Mangle has an endoskeleton inside it's mask. If you closely inside of the mask (inside the jaws to be precise) you can see that the mask has endoskeleton teeth, proving that there's an endoskeleton in it. That second head is just an extra head apart of the monstrosity.

Besides, that doesn't really get rid of the fact that Mangle has three legs.

I see what you are saying, but that is not what I quite mean. I'm using the eyes as an example to show how there is not two heads. I'm just trying to show on how Mangle could actually be Funtime Foxy

[RippoMadness]

Originally posted by Metbert:

Originally posted by RippoMadness:

An interesting theory, but has been brought up before and has been debunked:

Completely ignoring the fact that Mangle has another eye sitting next to it in its starting position in FNAF 2, giving us the total of three eyes, not two, and that there's also the question of how Mangle is holding the eye in its mask properly if it has no endoskeleton in it, Mangle has an endoskeleton inside it's mask. If you closely inside of the mask (inside the jaws to be precise) you can see that the mask has endoskeleton teeth, proving that there's an endoskeleton in it. That second head is just an extra head apart of the monstrosity.

Besides, that doesn't really get rid of the fact that Mangle has three legs.

sorry but only the adventure mangle and nightmare mangle have 3 legs . we don't saw Mangle stand up in fnaf2 so ... we can't be sure .

...

It's Mangle, just in different skins. There is no other difference between these varieties outside of that. There is no deniability here, Mangle has three legs.

"If it looks like duck, quacks like a duck, acts like a duck, then it's a duck."

[GenericNameTxt]

Originally posted by dewey1274:

Anyways, does this even matter?

Yes, it does. At least to people that care about the franchise and want to understand everything

[RippoMadness]

Originally posted by DatSpeedyCubester:

I see what you are saying, but that is not what I quite mean. I'm using the eyes as an example to show how there is not two heads. I'm just trying to show on how Mangle could actually be Funtime Foxy

I don't think you do understand. I'm giving you the reasons for why Mangle does, in fact, have two endskeleton heads. The eye example doesn't work because Mangle has three eyes (as shown from its starting position in Kid's Cove from FNAF 2), one of them just fell out.

[Metbert]

Originally posted by RippoMadness:

Originally posted by Metbert:

sorry but only the adventure mangle and nightmare mangle have 3 legs . we don't saw Mangle stand up in fnaf2 so ... we can't be sure .

...

It's Mangle, just in different skins. The is no other difference outside between these varieties outside of that. There is no deniability here, Mangle has three legs.

"If it looks like duck, quacks like a duck, acts like a duck, then it's a duck."

tecnically the "adventure" are different from the countrepart, think about foxy,springtrap,bonnie ecc..
if we want to be tecnical we saw mangle that in its starting room stays with 5 parts of body at the ground to stand up xD

[GenericNameTxt]

Originally posted by RippoMadness:

Originally posted by DatSpeedyCubester:

I see what you are saying, but that is not what I quite mean. I'm using the eyes as an example to show how there is not two heads. I'm just trying to show on how Mangle could actually be Funtime Foxy

I don't think you do understand. I'm giving you the reasons for why Mangle does, in fact, have two endskeleton heads. The eye example doesn't work because Mangle has three eyes (as shown from its starting position in Kid's Cove from FNAF 2), one of them just fell out.

I understand where you're coming from now. But also, we can see 3 eyes, but we've never seen 3 heads, have we?

[jupiter]

Originally posted by DatSpeedyCubester:

Originally posted by dewey1274:

Anyways, does this even matter?

Yes, it does. At least to people that care about the franchise and want to understand everything

Actually, I do care about the franchise. You should understand that just because somebody doesn't need to know everything still does care...

[jupiter]

Originally posted by DatSpeedyCubester:

Originally posted by RippoMadness:

I don't think you do understand. I'm giving you the reasons for why Mangle does, in fact, have two endskeleton heads. The eye example doesn't work because Mangle has three eyes (as shown from its starting position in Kid's Cove from FNAF 2), one of them just fell out.

I understand where you're coming from now. But also, we can see 3 eyes, but we've never seen 3 heads, have we?

"Three eyes" Actually, it would be "Nine eyes" to get three heads.

[jupiter]

Originally posted by dewey1274:

Originally posted by DatSpeedyCubester:

Yes, it does. At least to people that care about the franchise and want to understand everything

Actually, I do care about the franchise. You should understand that just because somebody doesn't need to know everything still does care...

Also, I'm sure the only reason why you're here is because you noticed that FNaF World isn't the only game, but when you bought the other games you were to scared by the title screen. Quick question. How can you even be a theorist if you didn't even play the games? okplzdonotkillmebecauseiwasangry.

[GenericNameTxt]

Originally posted by dewey1274:

Originally posted by DatSpeedyCubester:

Yes, it does. At least to people that care about the franchise and want to understand everything

Actually, I do care about the franchise. You should understand that just because somebody doesn't need to know everything still does care...

No one NEEDS to know everything, but some people do. And if you don't care about knowing "everything" even though it's one comment, just keep scrolling